Support the Café
Search our site

Wolf Hall showcases Thomas Cromwell as a sympathetic statesman and master of secrets

Wolf Hall showcases Thomas Cromwell as a sympathetic statesman and master of secrets

Hilary Mantel’s Booker winning series has been adapted for TV, with the first episode airing on PBS last night. The books are told from the perspective of Thomas Cromwell, a man who was chiefly regarded as a  doctrinaire toadie before Geoffrey Elton elevated him to chief architect of the English reformation in the 50s, in “The Tudor Revolution”.

Mantel’s Cromwell is Elton’s Cromwell; a man with a brilliant, incisive mind, working for long-term church reformation, and securing the future of England against succession woes and military threats from France and Spain. Cromwell has insights into banking, finance, trade, and spirituality, and is a self-made renaissance man born in poverty.

Vox reports that not all historians are enthusiastic about Mantel’s sympathetic treatment of Cromwell, but states that it’d make for poor entertainment if she focused on the bully depicted in historical records.

From Vox:

Good writers know that purely evil characters are boring. What makes Thomas Cromwell such a great character in Hilary Mantel’s books is his complications. He’s someone who enables and occasionally suggests immoral behavior, but he’s also the eyes we see his world through. It makes sense that he wouldn’t present his actions as completely manipulative and dirty.

Mark Rylance plays Cromwell in the TV adaptation in a role that sounds more like that of the master spy Varys in Game of Thrones than the power-wielding minister of the novels, but Vox notes that this seems inevitable as the series is not shot from the perspective of Cromwell, but that of an observer.

Reviews have mostly been favorable, and the show was well-received in Britain before it’s export. The NY Times review found Cromwell somewhat disappointing as a TV character despite a brilliant performance by Rylance.

Critic John Powers appeared on NPR’s Fresh Air to praise the series, calling it “darkly lit, finely acted and thoroughly compelling”. (Transcript and audio)

Are you a fan of the books? Have you been eagerly awaiting the American premiere? Let us know what you thought of the first episode and how the show compared to the novel.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

21 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Woodrum

The spelling is fine. The typing, not so much. Or was it just Freudian?

Paul Woodrum

My first impression, after watching the first episode, was, “Ah, the Carol Rove of his day.”

Marshall Scott

And, I fear, Brother Paul, that you have encountered a progressive spellchecker.

Christopher Donald

As an Anglican … perhaps it wasn’t a mistake 😉

David Allen

perhaps it was an Anglican spellchecker! 😀

rick allen

It arguably reflects Ms. Mantel’s more recent declaration that the Catholic Church “is not an institution for respectable people.”

rick allen

“Hilary Mantel, who indecently was raised Roman Catholic.”

Gotta love spellcheck.

Christopher Donald

People would do well to listen/read to the wonderful interview Terry Gross did with the author Hilary Mantel, who indecently was raised Roman Catholic.

Regardless of whether it strays from the truth we were taught in school or not, Mentel did research the book, and it is fiction, so she has license to twist it how e’er her muse leads her.

http://www.npr.org/2015/04/03/397285791/mantel-takes-up-betrayal-beheadings-in-bodies

Marshall Scott

Christopher, I think you meant “incidentally was raised Catholic,” and not “indecently” Blast spellcheck!

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_012
2020_013_B
2020_013_A

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café