Support the Café

Search our Site

Williams suggests restructure of ABC office, Kearon says not on ACC agenda

Williams suggests restructure of ABC office, Kearon says not on ACC agenda

Updated (9:48 a. m.) with a statement from the Anglican Communion Office that calls the “Anglican presidency” element of the story into question:

The Secretary General of the Anglican Communion has responded to an article in today’s The Telegraph newspaper that inaccurately stated: “The Anglican Church is drawing up plans… that would see the introduction of a ‘presidential’ figure to take over some of the global role of the Archbishop of Canterbury.”

“The opening paragraph of this article is mischievous,” said Canon Kenneth Kearon. “There are no such plans. The Archbishop of Canterbury simply said in the interview that he could see that in the future there might be some reflection on how the administrative load associated with the Anglican Communion might be better shared.

“The Anglican Communion has several decision-making bodies, one of which [the Anglican Consultative Council] is meeting in a few months’ time. Nothing like what this newspaper has suggested is on the agenda.”

The Telegraph reports that the Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams thinks the job of ABC has become too big for one man (sic):

The outgoing leader of the world’s 77 million Anglicans suggested a form of job share after admitting that he had failed to do enough to prevent a split over homosexuality.

Dr Williams said a new role should be created to oversee the day to day running of the global Anglican communion, leaving future Archbishops of Canterbury free to focus on spiritual leadership and leading the Church of England.

In his last major interview before he steps down later his year, he acknowledged that he had struggled to balance the growing demands of the job at home and abroad and admitted he had “disappointed” both liberals and conservatives.

He also said that the Church had been “wrong” in its treatment of homosexuals in the past but reiterated his opposition to same-sex marriage.

Entire interview is here.

The idea of relieving the Archbishop of Canterbury of certain responsibilities in order to allow him to do his job more prompted the 2001 Hurd Report. (Summary and Major recommendations.) The relevant recommendation reads:

Steps should be taken to establish a post at episcopal level at Lambeth funded by the Anglican Communion to act as the Archbishop of Canterbury’s right hand in Anglican Communion affairs, with a view to its holder deputising wherever practicable for the Archbishop in the Anglican Communion, and helping to coordinate support with the Anglican Communion Office. The post holder should come from the Anglican Communion overseas, and be selected by the Archbishop in consultation with the Anglican Consultative Council and Primates.

What are your thoughts?


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill Dilworth

John Chilton, maybe he hasn’t misunderstood our polity at all, but thought it would have been more expedient to make his case to the HoB in order to try to convince a majority of bishops exercising jurisdiction to withhold consents in the case of “problem” elections to the episcopate. That would presumably be easier than dealing with GC.

Nicole Porter

I believe the archbishop said “The Church was wrong over the ‘treatment’ of homosexuals” not the belief of what constitutes a marriage and a proper family.

Christopher Evans

Perhaps, as I asked of him in a piece at the Cafe, he might have spent more time with sexual and gender minorities. That his concern is meeting only with bishops shows again what may be true, that the office of bishop is not prone to humanizing? He certainly did not do much toward honoring the humanity of lgbtqi people. And yet, I still quote his works often and love his rambling Anglican way of doing theology. Perhaps now, he can devote his pen to humanizing.

Jim Naughton

My bad, Simon. I will amend.

Simon Sarmiento

Err, that is not the *full report*. That is only the Recommendations.Full text coming up shortly at Thinking Anglicans.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café