Support the Café

Search our Site

Why won’t ACNA say it is wrong to put gay people in prison?

Why won’t ACNA say it is wrong to put gay people in prison?

Archbishop Robert Duncan was given an opportunity yesterday by Cathy Grossman of Religion News Service to say that he did not support Uganda’s harsh new anti-gay law, which not only penalizes people involved in same-sex relationships, but also people who have knowledge of same-sex relationships and do not report them to the authorities.

The U. S. government and every major human rights group have publicly opposed the bill, but Archbishop Duncan, leader of the Anglican Church in North America couldn’t bring himself to do it.

Instead, along with some of the African archbishops who supported the Ugandan bill and others like it, he recently signed a statement decrying the western backlash against the legislation.

The Anglican Church in North America is led by a man who was so deeply offended by the ordination of a gay bishop that he decided to break away from the Episcopal Church and take tens of thousands of other people with him, but who is comfortable with church leaders who have successfully urged their governments to round up LGBT people and their supportive friends, and put them in jail.

For years, breakaway Anglicans have tried to downplay the role that simple anti-gay bigotry has played in their movement. They’d say that they didn’t hate gay people, they just didn’t think they should be able to be ordained or married. Or they’d say that homosexuality was just one symptom of the Episcopal Church’s drift from Biblical truth. Duncan’s unwillingness to say in a simple and straightforward way that he doesn’t think gay people and those who do not inform on them should be put in jail gives the lie to these arguments, as does the obsession with homosexuality evident in statements from the GAFCON primates council.

What we are seeing now is a comfortable white American religious leader who cannot bring himself to say that it is wrong to throw LGBT Africans in jail because he doesn’t want to offend the African archbishops who have been his allies.

Duncan is in a bind. On one hand, the bogus claim that the Anglican Church in North America is part of the Anglican Communion depends entirely on its relationships with Anglican provinces led by archbishops who support anti-gay legislation. On the other hand, ACNA’s leaders in this country know that their church won’t survive if its homophobic roots and willingness to countenance human rights violations that advance its institutional interests become widely known. His strategy at the moment seems to be to sign on to homophobic documents that circulate widely within the Anglican Communion while hoping that the U. S. media and the wider public doesn’t notice.

It is important, especially in places with strong breakaway movements such as Pittsburgh (Duncan’s former diocese), Fort Worth and South Carolina, that Episcopalians make it clear just how extreme Archbishop Duncan is willing to be.

It is also important that LGBT people and their allies keep asking ACNA and its leaders whether they would support an American version of the anti-gay laws that are supported by their allies in Uganda and Nigeria. If they do not support imprisoning LGBT people and those who refuse to inform on them in the United States, why do they refuse to say that they oppose the imprisonment of such people in Africa?

(For background on the ways in which African archbishops have worked with Duncan and other clergy who broke away from the Episcopal Church, read the “Barfoot memo” of 2004, Stephen Bates’ 2004 reporting on the strategy of anti-gay Anglicans to break up the Episcopal Church and force it out of the Anglican Communion and my 2006 article Following the Money.)


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John B. Chilton

Is ACNA making its followers aware of this?

We are deeply concerned that a U.S.-funded health clinic and medical research facility, the Makerere University Walter Reed Project (MUWRP), was raided by Ugandan authorities on April 3, leading to the arrest of one of the facility’s employees, allegedly for conducting “unethical research” and “recruiting homosexuals.” While that individual was subsequently released, this incident significantly heightens our concerns about respect for civil society and the rule of law in Uganda, and for the safety of LGBT individuals.

The MUWRP is engaged in efforts to improve public health and save lives. The Ugandan government is responsible for protecting all of its people, and attacks and intimidation of health care workers are unacceptable. The safety of health workers must be respected. We have temporarily suspended the operations of MUWRP to ensure the safety of staff and beneficiaries, and the integrity of the program.

Paul Van Brunt

“At any rate, has the Episcopal Church officially broken communion with Uganda yet?” (Christopher Johnson)

Christopher, TEC cannot break communion with Uganda because we are not in communion with them directly. We are in communion with Canterbury which makes us in communion with Uganda.

The first Instrument of Unity, which is the ABC, is how we are all interconnected.

William Gilders

Christopher Johnson, do you really believe there is an equivalence between TEC’s ordination of Gene Robinson and the Ugandan government’s church-supported campaign against LGBT Ugandans — that it’s all just a matter of “local context”? If so, I think you should go shopping for a new moral compass; your current one is malfunctioning badly.


Well, Christopher, regarding African poligamy, American Episcopalians are willing to allow for “local context.” After all, while we disagree with it, it does not entail the murder or imprisonment of fellow Christians. The African anti-gay laws are completely different, and the con evo Gafcon crowd are total hypocrits.

Kurt Hill

Brooklyn, NY

Jeffrey L. Shy, M.D.

I am afraid that I do not even think that former bishop Duncan’s motives are as good as biblical doctrinal purity over LGBT issues. I had a conversation with a certain person who knew Duncan well who related that Duncan had as his objective a break all along. The “gay thing” was just a means to an end. The quote was that Duncan had noted that they had failed to get a new separatist church over the ordination of women, but that the LGBT problem would likely allow them to get it. He was right. Just like SC, it was planned and staged long in advance. It was not about principles, it was about using people to get something that he/others wanted. It is not about principles, it is about power and control and influence. Their exploitation of the African homophobia is just another tool for them. Their hypocrisy will be their undoing in the end, of course. The more Danegeld that they pay, the more they will have the Danes with them. Mostly, I just hate how easy it is to lump us all together with the power-mongering haters. It is not just bad for us in the church, but all of those who truly need to church but are outside of it. It is horrible to endorse homicidal madness in Africa. It is also horrible to drive people away from the true church by heinous and infamous actions and words.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café