Support the Café
Search our site

Why the snark in the face of memory?

Why the snark in the face of memory?

Some people are apparently a little weary of all the remembering going on today. Which is strange coming from a tradition built on anamnesis.

Kurt C. Wiesner posts on his blog that maybe this is a day to be kind and to just listen.

Today is the 50 year anniversary of JFK’s assassination.

There are a lot of people remembering not just what happened, but specifically where THEY were when they heard the news.

There are some who are negatively remarking about these personal remembrances, as if to say with snark, “it’s not about you”.

Having been born in 1972, I have no personal memory of JFK’s assassination. But I do remember where I was when I heard that the Challenger had exploded…and that the planes had been crashed into the Twin Towers. I know that there is something about those two events that, for me, I will always remember where I was, and why the world seemed different from then on.

This kind of thing matters to our being community.

Be kind and patient today with those who are remembering: listen to their stories, and understand that you share this moment with them…even if it happened before you were born.

Anamnesis— which means recollecting God’s story–is at the heart of an incarnational faith.

As a guy who grew up listening to stories of depression and world war from my parents and grandparents, I know that these tales can get a little wearying at times…but these stories are what make memory and so create meaning–not just for them, but for all of us.

That’s why we must keep telling and hearing the stories…stories of holocaust, slavery, of civil disobedience, of war, of natural disaster, of migration, of oppression, of liberation… stories of where we were “when….”

It’s not being clever, ironic, or witty to write off these memories with a wave of a tweet. It’s being dismissive. When we dismiss these stories we end up dismissing the people who lived them. Without anamnesis we are left with amnesia.

Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café