Support the Café
Search our site

Why I dropped church and joined The Church

Why I dropped church and joined The Church

The Rev. Matt Marino makes distinction between “church” and “the Church” in his latest blog post:

What put me off about church was that it was so like me – feeding me a steady diet of myself: my wants, my preferences, my music. It was quite “relevant.” I came to realize that I actually needed church to be UN-like me: to be transcendent. The Church is unconcerned with “relevance.” It cares not for my preferences. When I ask it to change it grins quietly and asks me to change instead. When one panics about something and accosts the clergy at the door, the chances are good the priest will say, “We have been in God’s presence in the liturgy. How about we enjoy that for a bit? Call me on Tuesday.”

The Church is maddeningly un-fearful. It is not subject to politics or fads. It does not do focus groups and market research. It is not trying to impress me, win me or woo me. Instead of bending to my whims, it seeks to conform me to the image of Christ through immersion in patterns: daily in the Scriptures, weekly in Sacramental feeding of the Thanksgiving meal of the family of God, and living out God-time in the Christian Year. As a man of flesh, these patterns marinate me in the Gospel, bringing forth flavors in my life I never imagined.

The full blog post is found at his blog “the gospel side” and includes questions for discussion.

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

9 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mattmarino

And, Adam and Kurt, I now want to watch Firefly.

[please sign your name when you comment - thanks]

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Mattmarino

Thanks, Tom. Great thoughts. I am really not advocating lack of change. Just thoughtful change within the tradition.

The story taught in liturgy is the formative part. I am open to changing the modes of teaching the story. In the proper contexts a WOTP.com video and spoken word within the liturgy may be most appropriate...but probably not at Grace Cathedral or St. Gregory of Nyssa. I have seen urban youth moved to tears by the choir and pipe organ and suburban adults moved to tears by hip-hop and testimony through break dance. Both have increased power within the container of Word and Sacrament and common prayer.

I love your idea of establishing 9/11 as a day of remembrance and hope. I hope someone takes you up on that.

Matt Marino (name added by editor)

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Tom Sramek, Jr.

The challenge, of course, is to separate the traditions of The Church from the habits of the church, often circa 1950. Sometimes we confuse them, and defend holy (and sometimes less-than-holy) habits as if Jesus had instituted them. I'm not looking for a relevant church, but I am looking for a responsive church and one that acknowledges the world around us.

Witness the Holy Women, Holy Men (HWHM) commemoration for today, September 11. It calls for commemorating composer Harry Thacker Burleigh. I'm sure he was a wonderful person, but I ditched that commemoration in favor of the Diocese of NY's Propers for commemorating September 11, 2001. If I'd just strictly followed the church rules, I would have ignored 9/11 commemorations altogether. Why exactly does TEC not establish this day as "A Day for Remembrance and Hope" on our calendar?

The point I'm trying to make is that incarnational ministry of the kind Jesus did requires acknowledging what is going on in the world without being subverted by it. Too many traditions are traditions of church rather than Traditions of The Church.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Adam Spencer

Thanks Kurt! Now I want to go watch that episode again...

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Kurt Wiesner

🙂

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café