Support the Café

Search our Site

Why cops don’t believe rape victims

Why cops don’t believe rape victims

Rebecca Ruiz, in, looks at the brain science that explains why those working for the justice system often do not believe rape victims, and how to solve the dilemma.

Ruiz’s article begins with Tom Tremblay, who was an investigator in Burlington Vermont’s sex crimes unit:

Tremblay felt sex assault victims were telling the truth, and data supports his instincts: Only an estimated 2 to 8 percent of rape accusations are false, according to a survey of the literature published by the National Center for the Prosecution of Violence Against Women. Tremblay also knew the victims felt as if they were being treated like suspects, and it affected the choices they made. Surveyed about why they didn’t want to pursue a report, most victims said they worried that no one would believe them.

This is rape culture in action. It puts the burden of proving innocence on the victim, and from Steubenville, Ohio, to Notre Dame and beyond, we’ve seen it poison cases and destroy lives. But science is telling us that our suspicions of victims, the ones that seem like common sense, are flat-out baseless. A number of recent studies on neurobiology and trauma show that the ways in which the brain processes harrowing events accounts for victim behavior that often confounds cops, prosecutors, and juries.

The detailed article shares techniques emerging from science that are changing the way people view rape investigations, and hopefully can lead to an end of prevalent rape culture in our law enforcement.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kurt Wiesner

Pepper: that makes all this even more painful…

Pepper Marts

With the exception of the brief report on the past decade’s neurobiological research, Ruiz’ article could have been drawn from Susan Brownmiller’s book _Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape_ published by Simon and Schuster in 1975 – nearly 40 years ago.

Pepper Marts


I suspect also a fear-based denial? “If this woman was raped, then my mother/sister/wife/daughter could be raped”. Instead, the ostrich sticks his head in the sand. [Just my hunch]

JC Fisher

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café