Support the Café

Search our Site

Who chooses assisted suicide?

Who chooses assisted suicide?

The New York Times reports on assisted suicide and who chooses and uses it:

Dr. Richard Wesley has amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, the incurable disease that lays waste to muscles while leaving the mind intact. He lives with the knowledge that an untimely death is chasing him down, but takes solace in knowing that he can decide exactly when, where and how he will die.

Under Washington State’s Death With Dignity Act, his physician has given him a prescription for a lethal dose of barbiturates. He would prefer to die naturally, but if dying becomes protracted and difficult, he plans to take the drugs and die peacefully within minutes.

“It’s like the definition of pornography,” Dr. Wesley, 67, said at his home here in Seattle, with Mount Rainier in the distance. “I’ll know it’s time to go when I see it.”

Washington followed Oregon in allowing terminally ill patients to get a prescription for drugs that will hasten death. Critics of such laws feared that poor people would be pressured to kill themselves because they or their families could not afford end-of-life care. But the demographics of patients who have gotten the prescriptions are surprisingly different than expected, according to data collected by Oregon and Washington through 2011.

Dr. Wesley is emblematic of those who have taken advantage of the law. They are overwhelmingly white, well educated and financially comfortable. And they are making the choice not because they are in pain but because they want to have the same control over their deaths that they have had over their lives.


“There was a lot of fear that the elderly would be lined up in their R.V.’s at the Oregon border,” said Barbara Glidewell, an assistant professor at Oregon Health and Science University.

That has not happened, although the number of people who have taken advantage of the law has risen over time. In the first years, Oregon residents who died using drugs they received under the law accounted for one in 1,000 deaths. The number is now roughly one in 500 deaths. At least 596 Oregonians have died that way since 1997. In Washington, 157 such deaths have been reported, roughly one in 1,000.

In Oregon, the number of men and women who have died that way is roughly equal, and their median age is 71. Eighty-one percent have had cancer, and 7 percent A.L.S., which is also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease. The rest have had a variety of illnesses, including lung and heart disease. The statistics are similar in Washington.

There were fears of a “slippery slope” — that the law would gradually expand to include those with nonterminal illnesses or that it would permit physicians to take a more active role in the dying process itself. But those worries have not been borne out, experts say.

Read more here.

Another story from Canada is here.

h/t to frequent commenters Murdoch Matthew and Gary Paul Gilbert


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David Allen

Thanks Bill for the link. Good to know that the circus surrounding Terri Shiavo has been misunderstood even by faithful Roman Catholics.

Bro David

Bill Dilworth

David, you are mistaken. For an explanation of Catholic teaching regarding extraordinary means of sustaining life, read

David Allen

Perhaps you should read the article again Bill D. The linked article is not speaking of the same thing that June described. It is strictly about providing pain medication. The Roman Church would not allow patients in their hospitals to withdraw sustenance that June described. Have you forgotten the whole Terri Schiavo debacle?

Bro David

Bill Dilworth

June, not only do you not see it as the same as taking one’s life, but neither does the Catholic Church. It’s called the principle of double effect, and is explained here:

Murdoch Matthew


No one is prescribing assisted suicide, or even recommending it. Some want it as an option in case of need. And since such people are likely to avail themselves of it in any event, it would be well if they didn’t have to break a law in doing so.

If my old boss had been sure she’d be able to check out at will, she might not have blown her brains all over her bedroom wall, and traumatized her hapless roommate.

Gary saw his father through the end of his suffering from lung cancer. His dad probably would never have considered suicide, and, in any event, was in no condition to make decisions in his last months of life. But the people who stood by him have given serious thought to avoiding what he went through.

We all must lean on our communities, and look for their support; but in the end, only we know our situation, and are responsible for our decisions.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café