Support the Café
Search our site

What’s good for the Pope is good for the PB

What’s good for the Pope is good for the PB

As reported in The Telegraph,

Figures from the [National Catholic Safeguarding Commission for England and Wales] showed that cases involving 103 victims of alleged abuse were reported in 2010, compared with 52 victims’ cases in 2009. There were 18 people who alleged that they were abused during the course of 2010, the same number as during the previous year.


Baroness Scotland [, chair of the commission,] said the fact that the Pope had met abuse victims during his visit to Britain last year and had spoken strongly about the scandal had encouraged more people to speak out.

It’s good practice: if you take the problem of sex abuse in the church seriously, then you encourage people to speak out.

Our Presiding Bishop knows good practice; she’s been a leader. That’s why we remain flummoxed as to why she has had nothing to say about her role, while Bishop of Nevada, of receiving as a priest a man who had admitted to inappropriate touching. The one case turns out to have been in the public record, so it was in the man’s interest to reveal it. It turns out there were many more earlier instances of inappropriate sexual behavior by the man. Two current civil suits against the Catholic Church allege a psychological test by a Catholic institution showed he was prone to continue the behavior, and the results of this test was made available to the Episcopal Diocese of Nevada.

Just as perplexing, the presiding bishop shifted the task of addressing questions to the current bishop of Nevada. His response was to disparage the questioners, say the man’s record as an Episcopal priest was unblemished, and to allow him to resign his orders without deposing him (for being dishonest during the reception process).

Each one of these actions discourages people, victims and otherwise, from speaking out. It is behavior consistent a church that seeks first to avoid bringing scandal on the church or its bishops. That’s behavior that led the Catholic Church astray, the kind of behavior we had hoped The Episcopal Church had turned its back on.

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

5 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GrandmèreMimi

Accountability must follow.

gbullough, yes, indeed. From day one, when the news broke, I've been calling for accountability. Did you read my initial comment here?

June Butler

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
gbullough

June---

Humanity is one thing.

Vanity is another.

What else does a bishop have to offer but good judgement?

Rather like an airline pilot.

Accountability must follow.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
GrandmèreMimi

We Roman Catholics take this as a lesson, that like female CEOs, woman episcopal hierarchs are subject the same foibles (in this case clericalism) as their male counterparts.

gbullough, if you mean to say that women are human, I concur.

June Butler

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
gbullough

"That's why we remain flummoxed as to why she has had nothing to say"

Oh, come now; one need not be flummoxed. The answer is obvious, just as it is obvious one a Roman Catholic Bishop goes quiet.

She is likely saying nothing because there's nothing good that can be said, at least nothing that might not be expected to cut short the tenure of the first female Presiding Bishop.

We Roman Catholics take this as a lesson, that like female CEOs, woman episcopal hierarchs are subject the same foibles (in this case clericalism) as their male counterparts.

gbullough -please sign your name when you comment - thanks for participating. ~ed.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
GrandmèreMimi

John, thank you for this post. The lack of response by Presiding Bishop Katharine is very worrisome. I don't like it at all. Shifting all the responsibility to respond to the present bishop of Nevada, who was not the bishop who allowed Bede Parry into the priesthood of the Episcopal Church seems craven to me.

The PB's silence is unseemly. She's probably listening to lawyers, but her priority should be a pastoral response which encourages us all that the Episcopal Church takes seriously its responsibility to protect children, youths, and all members of the church from sexual abuse and to respond with appropriate compassion should the protective measures fail. I am seriously disappointed in her response, or rather lack thereof.

June Butler

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café