Support the Café

Search our Site

What the PB is saying at provincial synods

What the PB is saying at provincial synods

The presentation that Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori is making at provincial synods is now online. Here is an excerpt, what do you think about it?

If we are people who value that Anglican sense of ordered freedom, then we need to learn to live in the creative tension between complete order and complete freedom, both of which are ultimately deadly – order because it’s not open to change, and complete freedom because it has a hard time with enduring relationship. Abundant life and creativity come in the dance between what is finished and utter chaos. That lively tension applies to all parts of our lives, including how we make decisions.

Our churchwide governance work is largely based on parliamentary democratic methods. We have evolved a system that gives great attention to the details of process and structure in how decisions are made. We have a representation system that has at least something to do with interest group politics. We have made legislative decisions over the last few decades that have done great good in opening us up to the movement of the spirit. We have also done damage in voting, by creating winners and losers about several hundred issues at every General Convention.

There are other democratic ways of decision-making that are more deliberative, that depend on conversation and consensus more than on up-down, yes-no voting. We’ve begun to learn something about indaba in recent years, and to learn more communal modes of discernment. Our tradition is actually more deeply based in discernment, reflection, and prayer in community than it is in voting. Even those 11 disciples who had to replace Judas didn’t vote – they cast lots, and they took the one who was chosen, seemingly by random methods. They trusted in the leading of the Spirit. I’m not suggesting that we start throwing dice, but I do want to suggest that we have the ability to listen far more widely to the spirit at work in the lives of Episcopalians and of local faith communities than we did in the days when white, landowning men rode horses for days to gather in a small room and vote. Can you dream of a church that is able to listen to 2 million of us reflecting, discerning, and finding a way forward, in God’s time, without an arbitrary deadline? Can we dream of a Church that is engaged in creative and distinctive ways with the variety of cultural communities around us? Can we build a system that is responsive to emerging possibilities, following the leading of the Spirit?


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Chris Arnold
Ann Fontaine

It seems to have been taken down from the website.

William F. Hammond

The URL at the beginning (said to be for the presentation) has gone bad. (It had been good since Google indexed it.)

Chris Arnold

I am increasingly critical of the parliamentary-democratic system of our General Convention (Churchill said democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others!), and in particular I’m concerned that we have no “supreme court” who can check and balance the work of General Convention and the CCABs. I think it would be wonderful to be more attentive to the Spirit guiding the discernment of the body, that that would require several things:

– A clear doctrine of the Holy Spirit

– Guidance about how the corporate discernment process works, or it’s too easy for everyone to be hearing what they want to hear (1 John 4:1)

– Lots and lots of time! Imagine how long GenCon would be if we did this? I suppose it would be remedied if we didn’t try to get so much done at GenCon.

Come to think of it, if this method would act as a natural brake on the furious pace of our church’s change, then I’d be ok with it!

Clint Davis

The Quakers have been doing what she proposes for centuries. Her points are well made, and immediately I thought of the Friends. Look it up y’all, you’ll be glad you did.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café