Support the Café

Search our Site

What keeps impoverished families poor?

What keeps impoverished families poor?

Election season means a renewed interest in wages and inequality, but are we hearing real solutions to poverty, or just sound bites and buzzwords?

Matthew Desmond, Harvard sociologist and author, addresses poverty through housing costs in his latest book,  Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City, and in two articles published in the New York Times and the New Yorker. Desmond blames housing costs, which rise faster than wages, and which can compound with legal fees, eviction processes, and inadequate safety nets, to quickly wipe out savings, leaving many homeless and impoverished.

Writing in the Times, Desmond shares the story of a former neighbor, Larraine, and the trailer park they both lived in on the South Side of Milwaukee. The trailer park was referred to as an ‘environmental biohazard’ by city inspectors for the sheer number of code violations it had, but rent exceeded 70% of Larraine’s income each month.

Larraine, a 54 year old grandmother on disability, lived on $5 a day after rent and utilities, and was eventually evicted; everything Larraine owned ended up in a dump. The rent she paid contributed to the half-million annual her landlord netted from a dilapidated and squalid living environment. Evictions led to more profits, and he employed unusual contracts which oftentimes left him with the mobile homes that had belonged to the tenants, which he would then rent to a new family.

Desmond puts the total cost of preventing these evictions–and squalid living conditions–around 22 billion per year. Most of our housing assistance, however, is tied up in homeowner tax benefits, which reward more affluent people who already own homes.

From the Times piece:

We have the money. We’ve just made choices about how to spend it. In 2008, the year Larraine was evicted, federal expenditures for direct housing assistance totaled more than $40 billion, but homeowner tax benefits exceeded $171 billion, a figure equivalent to the budgets for the Departments of Veterans Affairs, Homeland Security, Justice and Agriculture combined.

In his New Yorker piece, Desmond shares the stories of other families who are perpetually evicted, and the landlords who call the lawyers. Forced Out shows how cyclical eviction is, and how minor mistakes and setbacks can result in huge, self-perpetuating, economic challenges for impoverished families. His main focus is on Arleen, a young mother, and her struggling family. As a young woman, Arleen left public housing, thinking she’d be able to make it on her own. When she lost her job and fell behind in her rent, she discovered she couldn’t return to public housing, and her cycle begins.

From the New Yorker article:

If Arleen wanted public housing, she would have to save roughly six hundred dollars to repay the Housing Authority for having left the subsidized apartment years before without giving notice; then wait two to three years until the list unfroze; then wait another two to five years until her application made it to the top of the pile; then pray that the person with the stale coffee and the heavy stamp reviewing her file would somehow overlook the eviction record that she’d accumulated while trying to make ends meet in the private housing market on a welfare check.

The heart-breaking piece alternates between Arleen and her landlord, Sherrena, telling two different but very similar stories of costs, bills, and pitfalls that keep amassing despite the best intentions of all parties.

Desmond’s central thesis is that housing costs, and the legal fees and penalties associated along with the lack of support from government agencies, combine to keep the poor poor, regardless of good intentions or hard work.

Did the two articles change anything about the way you view poverty? Were you able to relate to the experiences of Arleen or Sherrena? Evicted is available from Penguin Random House.

Photo of the trailer park referenced in New York Times article / cover of Evicted 


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dr. William A. Flint, MDiv, PhD

In our world today millions of children, as well as adults go hungry. When I drive home from my office everyday I pass fast food places for miles and yet I also pass by those who are hungry. Why?

I am not sure there is an easy solution to this situation. I wish it was, but it tends to get worse as time passes. Desmond points out some of the problems facing us in finding solutions.

The early Church was community and shared of its commonwealth with all who were in the community even if they were not part of the church. The early Christians saw it as their duty to Love.

The early Church said “silver and gold have we not, but such as we have, give we you in the Name of Jesus of Nazareth.” Today’s church can not say silver and gold have we not, but neither can say but such as we have give we you in the Name of Jesus of Nazareth.

Institution vs Community is a struggle. How do we capture the Love once found in the earliest church today? Let us continue to work for the day that every child and adult has food enough to be filled and not become wary of the task set before us. In the Cross of Christ we have our Hope. I don’t trust politicians or governments to solve this problem. God gave us His Church to feed the sheep.

Ann Fontaine

Thanks for this review- will be sharing with our EfM Group which has been reflecting on homelessness especially as it affects kids and hunger.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café