Support the Café

Search our Site

Watching the odds on the next ABC

Watching the odds on the next ABC

You can not only see the current line the bookmakers have on who might be the next Archbishop of Canterbury but you can look at the history of those odds.

Here is the site that shows the current odds on nominees considered to have a chance to be in the running.

Here is the history of the odds for Bishop Graham. Click on a name on the main page to see the history for that person.

Being a neophyte on these things–everything I know about bookmaking I’ve learned from The Sting–it’s hard for me to parse exactly what the numbers mean. So I turned to the Cafe’s resident economist, John B. Chilton, for an explanation:

The default is sort by favorite (FAV). You can toggle to sort by NAME (although it’s not very handy since this ain’t horses, and it’s not sorting by last name but first).

As to the meaning of the numbers, let’s take the example of the Paddy Power column.

Christopher Cocksworth is listed as 6/4. That means if you bet a pound on him and he’s chosen you’ll get your pound back plus 6/4 of a pound.

Richard Chartres is listed as 12, meaning 12/1 or 12 to 1. That means if you bet a pound on him and he’s chosen you’ll get your pound back plus 12 more pounds. (See this.)

Another thing, the bookmakers aren’t oddsmakers so much as they are adjusting the odds so that those who bet against Cocksworth (by choosing someone else) would pay off those bet on Cocksworth.

Bookmakers aren’t taking risks. They’re setting the odds so they have no risk and yet guarantee themselves something left over essentially by attaching odds so they don’t add up to 100%.

It’s really no different from an insurance making money figuring out the actuarially fair odds and then offering odds that are slightly unfair. Why only slightly? — competition.

It appears that right now it’s Christopher Cocksworth to win, Graham James to place, and John Sentamu to show.

Do the movement in the odds history match with any events that you are aware of? Is there information that punters (bettors) seem to have reacted to?


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill Dilworth

Of the three favorites, ++Sentamu is the only name I recognize. I wonder if that’s a good thing or not?

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café