Support the Café

Search our Site

Washington Post analyses criticism that #BlackLivesMatter endangers police

Washington Post analyses criticism that #BlackLivesMatter endangers police

The growing #BlackLivesMatter movement has resonated with a number of religious leaders, and critics have objected, claiming that the movement has endangered the lives of police, and resulted in an increase in police deaths.

Readers on this site joined this vocal group when they voiced displeasure with The Right Reverend C. Andrew Doyle, who released a statement on the murder of Deputy Darren Goforth, claiming that Bishop Doyle had failed to name #BlackLivesMatter as dangerous and the ideological root of an upswing in attacks against police officers.

Blogging for The Washington Post, Radley Balko investigated the actual number of attacks on police, and compared them to historical data, looking at both raw numbers and numbers adjusted for the increase in number of police. They found that the raw numbers, and the adjusted data, show that officers are in less danger now than they have been for decades.

From the article:

So when police advocates say that 2014 saw an 80+ percent increase in homicides of cops over 2013, remember a few things: First, 2013 wasn’t just an all-time low, it was an all-time low by a significant margin. Second, the 2013 figure was so low that even a small increase will look large when expressed as a percentage. Third, the figure for the following year, 2014, (51 officers killed) was essentially consistent with the average for the previous five years (50 killed), and still lower than any five-year average going back to 1960.

Balko also analyzed assaults, and found that assaults were at a historic low.

Balko wraps up his piece by questioning if the oft-repeated statement that police are facing more danger now than ever before isn’t actually causing more danger for police officers, and states that a climate of fear and panic is a dangerous one to operate in, especially for people in already high-stress work environments.

Will this information help you navigate the often tricky conversations around race, justice, and policing we’re having? Do you think it’s irresponsible or potentially dangerous for people to cultivate this type of atmosphere?


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café