Support the Café

Search our Site

Uruguay cannot change provinces

Uruguay cannot change provinces

The Anglican Consultative Council turned down a bid by the Diocese of Uruguay to switch from the province of the Southern Cone to the province of Brasil. The dioceses elected candidate for Bishop was turned down by the province and the diocese wants to ordain women to the priesthood, which the Southern Cone does not allow.

Brasil is the northern neighbor to Uruguay.

The Anglican Journal reports:

The diocese of Uruguay says it feels “abandoned and unsupported” after the standing committee of the Anglican Consultative Council (ACC) turned down its request to change provinces.

The diocese, which is part of the province of the Southern Cone, has asked that it be transferred to the province of Brasil, which it says is “more compatible” in terms of theology, mission and philosophy.

It appealed to the ACC standing committee to review its decision, saying it feels “adrift, as if condemned to stay in a province where it doesn’t fit.”

In 2010, the diocese voted to seek another jurisdiction after a proposal to allow dioceses to individually permit the ordination of women to the priesthood was turned down by the 10th Southern Cone synod. The diocese of Uruguay, which currently has female deacons, has been requesting the ordination of women for more than a decade.

In a press statement, Uruguay’s diocesan permanent committee, said the standing committee’s suggestions for a way forward only focused on the election of a bishop co-adjutor, which it undertook last year. This election was not ratified by the province, however.

Archdeacon Michael Pollesel, former general secretary of the Anglican Church of Canada, was elected in that process. The province has rejected his election twice, a move that the Uruguay diocese described as “the last straw.”

The diocese said it would have no problem holding another episcopal election, but that the ministry and mission of the new bishop and the diocese would “still be constrained by the missiological, philosophical and theological differences” with the province. The standing committee appears to have overlooked these differences “and offers no way forward,” it said. The diocese has tried to “follow the rules and its request is still being ignored.”


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Where could we read the standing committee’s report and how the voting unfolded?

Savi Hensman

They are not even seeking alternative episcopal oversight, just realignment within a particular geographical region. Uruguay borders Brazil, so it would seem a fairly modest request. But perhaps the ACC is afraid that the Southern Cone would no longer be viable if dioceses which found it oppressive could be freed from it.


Sounds about right, Paige.

Kyrie eleison!

JC Fisher

Ye gods, WHY must Anglicans KEEP THWARTING THE GOSPEL?!?!

Paige Baker

So let me get this straight….

If you don’t want women priests or bishops, and/or you don’t approve of ordaining LGBT clergy (partnered or otherwise), you can request alternative episcopal oversight. But if you *want* to ordain women/LGBTs to the priesthood or the episcopate, and you request alternative episcopal oversight, you are just out of luck?

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café