Support the Café

Search our Site

Up in arms

Up in arms

Colin Woodward, writing in Tufts Magazine, says that there’s never been “an America,” but rather eleven Americas—each a distinct nation–each viewing violence, as well as everything else, in its own way.

Last December, when Adam Lanza stormed into the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, with a rifle and killed twenty children and six adult staff members, the United States found itself immersed in debates about gun control. Another flash point occurred this July, when George Zimmerman, who saw himself as a guardian of his community, was exonerated in the killing of an unarmed black teenager, Trayvon Martin, in Florida. That time, talk turned to stand-your-ground laws and the proper use of deadly force. The gun debate was refreshed in September by the shooting deaths of twelve people at the Washington Navy Yard, apparently at the hands of an IT contractor who was mentally ill.

Such episodes remind Americans that our country as a whole is marked by staggering levels of deadly violence. Our death rate from assault is many times higher than that of most other countries, whether highly urbanized or sparsely populated. State-sponsored violence, too—in the form of capital punishment—sets our country apart. Last year we executed more than ten times as many prisoners as other advanced industrialized nations combined—not surprising given that Japan is the only other such country that allows the practice. Our violent streak has become almost a part of our national identity.

What’s less well appreciated is how much the incidence of violence, like so many salient issues in American life, varies by region. Beyond a vague awareness that supporters of violent retaliation and easy access to guns are concentrated in the states of the former Confederacy and, to a lesser extent, the western interior, most people cannot tell you much about regional differences on such matters. Our conventional way of defining regions—dividing the country along state boundaries into a Northeast, Midwest, Southeast, Southwest, and Northwest—masks the cultural lines along which attitudes toward violence fall. These lines don’t respect state boundaries. To understand violence or practically any other divisive issue, you need to understand historical settlement patterns and the lasting cultural fissures they established.

The original North American colonies were settled by people from distinct regions of the British Isles—and from France, the Netherlands, and Spain—each with its own religious, political, and ethnographic traits. For generations, these Euro-American cultures developed in isolation from one another, consolidating their cherished religious and political principles and fundamental values, and expanding across the eastern half of the continent in nearly exclusive settlement bands. Throughout the colonial period and the Early Republic, they saw themselves as competitors—for land, capital, and other settlers—and even as enemies, taking opposing sides in the American Revolution, the War of 1812, and the Civil War.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marshall Scott

Bill, I think there was significant Spanish influence, too, in New Orleans; and then there’s Puerto Rico.

I was a bit surprised, too, by the connection of much of Texas with “Greater Appalachia.” That said, for much of that area the first English-speaking settlers did come from Appalachia, lead by Sam Houston; and it was not so much plantation culture. He also includes the Ozarks in that “nation,” where there is much in common with Appalachians farther east.

That said, I agree the whole premise is a bit of a stretch. I did read The Nine Nations of North America years ago, in which cultural and economic issues were the tools of analysis, and not simply violence and/or gun culture. I have wondered whether those authors would see much difference now. As for being a-historical: well, that’s the American sin, isn’t it?


JC, that’s how I read it. “Original” and “colonies” just seemed to go with “thirteen,” I guess. I figured if were we being super inclusive and talking about any European colonies on the continent that Russia (Alaska) and Greece (Florida, again) would have made the list – to say nothing of the Germans who settled in the colony of Pennsylvania, or the Swedes in what became Delaware.

I don’t get Woodward’s take on American geography and culture in other ways. For example, he claims north Texas is part of what he calls “Greater Appalachia,” which I think ( and I suspect most other people from those parts would agree) is BS.

Bill Dilworth


I think the confusion arises because the phrase “original North American colonies” suggests those that because the first 13 States. And that’s not what is meant, apparently.

[re Spanish colonies, don’t forget Florida, also]

JC Fisher

Hey, would appreciate a LINK to this story—

Ann Fontaine

Bill: the Southwest and California


Sorry, that last comment was me.

Bill Dilworth

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café