2020_010_A
Support the Café
Search our site

Trinity Wall Street, Guns and Walmart

Trinity Wall Street, Guns and Walmart

A letter from the Rector of Trinity Wall Street:

A letter to parish membership from the Rev. Dr. James H. Cooper, rector of Trinity Wall Street, concerning Trinity’s filing a lawsuit in Delaware Federal District Court.

Dear Parish members,

As you know, Trinity Wall Street has long recognized that our considerable resources give us both a responsibility and an opportunity to engage constructively with businesses in which we invest where opportunities exist to enhance returns for both shareholders and society.

As part of this effort, we recently initiated dialogue with certain companies toward assuring they balance the benefits of selling certain products against the risks these sales pose to the public and to the companies’ reputation and brand value. As responsible investors, not just socially responsible investors, we have done so in a manner which we believe is consistent with the business interests of each company. We wanted to let you know of developments with respect to one of these companies: Wal-Mart.

We sought to introduce a Proposal for inclusion in Wal-Mart’s proxy, to be voted on by the company’s shareholders at its upcoming Annual Meeting. The Proposal asks that Wal-Mart’s Board of Directors oversee the development of policies and standards to guide management’s decision whether or not Wal-Mart should sell products falling in one or more of three categories: products that are 1) especially dangerous to the public, 2) pose a substantial risk to Wal-Mart’s reputation, and 3) would reasonably be considered offensive to the community and family values that Wal-Mart seeks to associate with its brand. The Proposal provided that it was intended, among other things, to cover policies and standards that would be applicable to determining whether or not Wal-Mart should sell guns equipped with magazines holding more than ten rounds of ammunition (“high capacity magazines”).

To be clear: this is not an “anti-gun” proposal. Nor is it a proposal to end the sale of certain products. We are simply asking that shareholders be allowed to consider whether the Board has an obligation to assure that the company’s standards and values are uniformly considered and applied when the sale of certain products can have momentous consequences. We note that Wal-Mart has previously refused to sell products such as music that depicts violence or sex, as well as high capacity magazines separate from a gun, out of respect for family and community interests.

After Wal-Mart refused to include the Proposal in its 2014 Proxy Materials and in the wake of a “no action” letter from the SEC’s Corporate Finance Division, which we believe departs from its past rulings, Trinity Wall Street filed a lawsuit in Delaware Federal District Court that asks the Court to require inclusion of the Proposal so that all shareholders may reflect on this important question of Board oversight.

We cannot predict the outcome of this legal step, but we believed it was important to proceed given our commitment to our Parish’s precepts and our dedication to assuring that matters of importance to our congregation, and society, are raised and given the consideration they deserve.

In prayer and partnership,

Jim Cooper

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nancy Davidge

Thank you Trinity Wall Street. For both initiating this conversation with Walmart and its shareholders, and for taking this further action to try to bring these questions to the attention of the Walmart shareholders for their consideration. I look forward to learning more.

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café