Support the Café

Search our Site

Title IV charges against Bishop Bruno sent to Reference Panel

Title IV charges against Bishop Bruno sent to Reference Panel

The complaint by members of St James the Great and others against The Rt Rev Jon Bruno of Los Angeles has been accepted and referred to a Panel of Reference for review and action. Bishop Clayton Matthews is the head of the Office of Pastoral Development whose office deals with Title IV complaints against bishops.

From Religion News Services:

The national Episcopal Church has referred charges against L.A. Bishop J. Jon Bruno to a three-bishop panel “for further review and action,” according to Bishop F. Clayton Matthews, head of the church’s Office of Pastoral Development.

The charges were brought by members of St. James the Great Episcopal Church in Newport Beach, CA, and other clergy and lay members of the Los Angeles Diocese. The charges – called a presentment – include many instances of alleged “dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation” by Bishop Bruno in connection with the pending sale of the St. James the Great property. The presentment also alleges conduct unbecoming a bishop and violations of the vows of ordination. …

“I have been conducting interviews and reviewing correspondence with persons relevant to the matters you have raised,” Bishop Matthews wrote to representatives of the St. James congregation. “I have determined that if the allegations presented are true, canonical violations may have occurred.” Bishop Matthews forwarded the allegations to the Reference Panel of the church, which consists of himself, the church’s presiding bishop, and the head of the church’s Disciplinary Board. The Panel has a range of options available, from mediation to sanctions against Bishop Bruno to his removal.

From the Newport Beach Independent  — The Rt Rev. Catharine Waynick is the other member of the panel with the Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori and Bishop Matthews.



Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café