Support the Café
Search our site

Time (Lords) for gender equality

Time (Lords) for gender equality

The thirteenth incarnation of Dr Who was revealed on Sunday by the BBC, and the internet exploded in delight and dismay at the news that the Doctor will, this time, be played by a woman.

Interesting to church Whovians was the reflection of familiar arguments over whether priests could sensibly or canonically be women. The Revd Richard Peers, a priest in the Diocese of Liverpool, tweeted,

The Rt Revd Philip North, Bishop of Burnley known for his opposition to the ordination of women, immediately disputed the suggestion:

The Rt Revd Paul Bayes, Bishop of Liverpool, saw a connection, though.

The Twishop Index, which follows Church of England twittering bishops, noted that this time, at least, the church was ahead of the game:

while in a response to Fr Richard (above), Christ Church, Fulwood, expanded its imagination beyond the priesthood to wonder about implications for the divine in the reimagining of Dr Who’s gender.

The Revd Bosco Peters picks up that theme in a blogpost:

Yesterday, I started the day by joining a discussion that interlocked The Doctor being regenerated as a woman, women priests, and the possibility that if the incarnation happened today this could be a female. …

If women cannot represent Christ, then Christ cannot represent women. For those who have any representative dimension to priesthood at all, ordaining females is a logical consequence of baptising females. It may have taken a couple of millennia wake up to the logic (just as it did for slavery; just as it seems to currently in other areas of church life).

In the 1980s, the creator of Dr Who urged that a woman take the role in one of the regenerations. As one committed to equality, I am delighted that, three decades later, this is becoming a reality. The Master has been played by a woman. Now The Doctor will be too. That the decision is controversial is fascinating. That there is crossover into theological discussions is wonderful.

Read more theological reflection at liturgy.co.nz .

The Doctor is a humanoid alien, a Time Lord whose sacrificial love for the human race and the planet earth has been demonstrated repeatedly over the course of the show’s more than fifty years. S/he preaches kindness, celebrates love, and regenerates into a new incarnation each time s/he apparently dies.

So might the casting of a female Doctor Who really have implications for how the next generation of viewers understand the genders of their religion?

Featured image: baby Weeping Angels at the Dr Who Experience, Cardiff Bay, UK. “Don’t blink.”

Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_012
2020_013_B
2020_013_A
2020_011

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café