Support the Café
Search our site

#ThePassionLive

#ThePassionLive

On Palm and Passion Sunday, Tyler Perry’s Passion went live. It was, by many accounts, a blockbuster. Not all reviews were uniformly positive, however.

Twitter was full of superlative praise for the 2-hour long show, setting the Passion of Christ in contemporary New Orleans.

passion tweet 1 passion tweet 2 passion tweet

Not everyone was impressed.

passion tweet 3 passion tweet 4 passion tweet 5

The Religion News Service review criticized the use of familiar music instead of original material.

…to be accurate, “The Passion” was only live in part; most of the story segments appeared to be pre-filmed and, it seems, pre-sung.

Still, as familiar as those forms might be, it’s doubtful many of us ever thought we’d see them mashed together into one semi-live, Jesus-jukebox musical — hosted and narrated by Tyler Perry from a New Orleans stage on the banks of the Mississippi. Nor did we expect to see one of mankind’s greatest stories, a tale and event that launched one of the world’s great religions, reduced to broad, borrowed pop-song bromides. It was well-sung, to be sure; it just wasn’t well thought out.

Rather than use original music, “The Passion” tweaked the lyrics to old favorites, often to odd effect. Chris Daughtry’s Judas singing “Wake Me Up Inside” might have conveyed the suffering of a man in turmoil (as Perry spelled it out for us as soon as the song ended), but it told you nothing specific about the turmoil of the man who was about to betray Jesus. And while Trisha Yearwood’s version of “I Won’t Give Up On Us” was lovely, it still felt far more romantic than maternal, just as Yearwood felt more Country Star than Virgin Mother.

Others were delighted by the connection of the soundtrack of their lives to the story of Holy Week.

passion tweet 11 passion tweet 12

Still, the Atlantic wonders,

passion tweet 8

The article elaborates.

From a religious perspective, this represents low expectations about what people are interested in with regard to theology and faith. The special was definitely a creative way to tell the story of Jesus, and it’s arguably remarkable to see the story of the crucifixion and resurrection broadcast on primetime television. But the trappings also seem to suggest that the middle- and upper-middle class people watching at home will most resonate with the story of a poor fisherman if they see him dressed and coiffeured like he’s headed to Starbucks. It mainly tells the story of the gospels through music that has nothing to do with the gospels, hoping that the emotional register of dramatic pop songs can serve as a clean substitute for religious fervor.

“Candace S” addressed the division of opinion itself.

Did we ever ask people why they liked this? Before we smacked folks up the head with links to books and videos of our favorite theologians, did we ask them what attracted them to THIS story? (I’m telling on myself here.) Those might tell us something about what WE missed. …

Some people called it Bad Theology. Other people were moved. Some people loved the Passion Live, others hated it. But this weekend I learned that those categories — bad theology and good theology — are irrelevant for most people. I have to deny my ego to say “my categories are irrelevant.” Because then that means I’m not the end or the way.

By the end of the night, and beyond, as the event is released on internet tv outlets, opinion of the spectacle remains divided.

passion tweet 6 passion tweet 9 passion tweet 10

As People magazine observes, “Twitter has A LOT of feelings about The Passion.” Did you watch? What did you think of this modern-day Passion Play?

This post has been updated.

Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café