Support the Café
Search our site

“The Year of the Bible” in a state founded on religious freedom

“The Year of the Bible” in a state founded on religious freedom

A bill adopted unanimously in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives would make 2012 “the year of the Bible” in the Commonwealth. The rector of an Episcopal parish in the Diocese of Bethlehem, among others, says “not so fast!” Others point out that Pennsylvania was founded on the principle of religious freedom and that the law deviates from that tradition.


The Times-Leader of Wilkes-Barre reports:

Sponsored by Rep. Rick Saccone, R-Allegheny County, the “non-controversial resolution” ends with “in recognition of both the formative influence of the Bible on our commonwealth and nation and our national need to study and apply the teachings of the Holy Scriptures.”

“All over the Pennsylvania Capitol, one can easily see the tremendous influence that Christianity and the Bible have had over our founders and predecessors. These images and quotes illustrating the beliefs and morals that have shaped our great commonwealth must never be forgotten,” Saccone said.

The Rev. Daniel Gunn, leader of St. Stephen’s Episcopal Church in Wilkes-Barre, said he disagrees with the House resolution and feels government should refrain from religious proclamations.

“There’s a reason we have separation of church and state,” Gunn said. “I do not deal with legislative issues from the pulpit, and I don’t think the legislature should be dealing too much with religious issues,” Gunn said.

Jonathan Malesic, an associate professor of theology at King’s College who is a staunch supporter of the separation of church and state, said the resolution “flies in the face of Pennsylvania’s history.”

He noted the state’s initial European settlers, the Quakers, “didn’t want to institute a Quaker theocracy. They wanted religious freedom. Pennsylvania was the religiously free colony.”

“To see something like this in Pennsylvania, considering our current religious diversity and our history of religious diversity,” contradicts the Quaker’s intent.

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Benedict Varnum

On the other hand, if the wall separating church and state is torn down, am I okay to get my vestry to declare it the "Year of Binding Legislation over Pennsylvania?"

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café