Support the Café
Search our site

The prevalence and perils of Jesus comedy

The prevalence and perils of Jesus comedy

Two trending videos on the web concerning Jesus comedy:


Saturday Night Live’s entertaining and (dare I say) thought provoking sketch on Jesus visiting Tim Tebow and the Denver Broncos after a win.

Jesus tells Tebow that he can’t keep doing all the work by himself, and that studying the actual playbook (instead of just the Bible) would help him become a better QB. Jesus also “suggests” that Tim could take it down a notch…

In addition, there is Tim Minchin’s performance of “Woody Allen Jesus” that almost aired on The Jonathan Ross Show:

Being Christmas, I thought it would be fun to do a song about Jesus, but being TV, I knew it would have to be gentle. The idea was to compare him to Woody Allen (short, Jewish, philosophical, a bit hesitant), and expand into redefining his other alleged attributes using modern, popular-culture terminology.

It’s not a particularly original idea, I admit, but it’s quite cute. It’s certainly not very contentious, but even so, compliance people and producers and lawyers all checked my lyrics long before the cameras rolled.

The song was performed, but was cut after debate. Minchin wrote a great deal about his experience and his thoughts on why is was cut.

It’s not new seeing Jesus video, be it straight comedy or satire. Jesus is frequently on comedic TV, with most of these “appearances” happening on animated shows (The Simpsons, South Park, Family Guy).

Such shows are almost always protested in one way or another, and the recent SNL skit was no exception, thanks to Pat Robertson and others.

What, if anything, is off limits concerning Jesus?

Is it important to critically examine media that uses Jesus for comedy or satire?

Or should we just be laughing (that is, if it’s funny)?

Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café