Support the Café
Search our site

The peculiar popularity of Thomas Kinkade

The peculiar popularity of Thomas Kinkade

S. Brent Plate assesses the peculiar appeal of Thomas Kinkade, “the painter of light,” who died earlier this month at 54.

Beauty. Emotion. Buying. Kinkade pulled together religion, art, and commerce to sell a feeling.

Kinkade sold a great many of these feelings through some curious approaches to painting and a shrewd business distribution system. Critics easily dismissed his paintings as kitsch, poor art, or perhaps not even art at all. While I don’t really like Kinkade’s paintings, I believe it would be naïve to simply dismiss his work, to stop querying the deeper reasons for its mass appeal. Kinkade’s pictures may or may not tell us much about art, but they do tell us about the work of art. Art works, it has a job to do, and the effects of art can be more important than the pictures themselves.

Kinkade’s is a theo-aesthetic, a distant, or perhaps bastardized, version of Romanticism, that great cultural movement begun in the late eighteenth, and carried forward into the nineteenth century. Romanticism was in large part a reaction against the overly-rational approaches of the Enlightenment; the Terror of the French Revolution, the spoils of industrialization, and war across Europe left many balking at the so-called progress of the rational mind. Poets like Goethe, and Shelley, and philosophers like Schiller, Kant, and Schlegel began to pay attention to the emotions, to intuition, and to aesthetic experiences that weren’t comprehensible by rational means.

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Woodrum

Is this a parable for the Episcopal Church? After reading one salvation proposal after another one wonders if some aren't willing to sell out "in order to make (TEC) more saleable.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
C. Wingate

One important point that Plate misses was caught by Joe Carter in this article from First Things: Kinkade actually started painting in a significantly different style, and indeed continued to paint in his own style under an assumed name, so perhaps not to hurt sales of his main line of merchandise. And I would agree with the assessment that, judged by technique, his older style stuff is better. And then you get something like this supposed depiction of the Cape Hatteras Light which sets it on a New England coast instead of on a mid-Atlantic barrier island.

It galled me to hear him compare himself to Norman Rockwell, not just because the latter is a much better technician, but also because Rockwell never prostituted his technique to the sentimental scenes he painted. And at that there is a lot wider range of emotion in Rockwell's work (think of Rosie the Riveter versus The Problem We All Live With). Kinkade, to be blunt, sold his artistry out: he switched to making what he had to understand as inferior craft in order to make it more saleable.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café