Support the Café
Search our site

The O’Malley model?

The O’Malley model?

Mark Silk suggests that Roman Catholic bishops stop talking smack about marriage equality. After noting that the bishops and their allies were outmaneuvered in New York, he writes:

One hopes, however, that in the days to come New York’s bishops will calm down and think more carefully about what happened and what lies ahead. Powerful elites may have done their part, but at bottom what carried the day were two of the most powerful principles in U.S. society: equality under the law and religious freedom. Americans, including New York legislators, find it difficult to resist a claim to the same rights as other citizens. At the same time, we are far more ready than, say, Europeans, to carve out exemptions on religious grounds, and once these were hammered into acceptable form in Albany, the necessary votes were there.

….

I am not unmindful of the challenge faced by religious leaders opposed to the incoming tide of SSM in American society. Same-sex couples are going to be showing up all over the place, wanting to belong to your churches and synagogues and mosques, expecting to send their children to your schools, and having no patience with your telling them that their relationships are immoral. But if you’ve got to make the case, make it on your own doctrinal terms. And spare the hyperbole and incivility.

That’s been the approach of Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston, who since 2004 has had to operate his archdiocese with SSM as the law of the land. Even as he has defended the church’s position on marriage, he has made it clear that he wants “all baptized Catholics to come to Mass and be part of our community,” and has established a policy that his parochial schools must not “discriminate or exclude any categories of students.” He also does not refer to same-sex marriage as same-sex “marriage.” The Catholic Church declines to recognize civil divorce. Should it therefore refer to your formerly married spouse as your “wife” or “husband”?

Reading the statements of New York’s Roman Catholic bishops and most of its Episcopal bishops in the wake of the approval of marriage equality gave one a strong sense of the differences between the two churches. I wonder if it is worth calling that difference to people’s attention?

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tgflux

Yet as susceptible as we are to religious exemptions, we take a dim view of religious impositions. And here, Catholic hierarchs need to grasp that their “secular”–i.e. natural law–arguments against SSM aren’t merely unpersuasive, they’re not considered secular. Bishops can argue till they’re blue in the face that one-man-one-woman marriage is the Way of Nature. The public considers the source and concludes that this is simply religious special pleading.

The money passage, for me, of this article.

Fundamentalist religions (inc. Roman Catholicism in its Popoid iteration) don’t want to be subject to scientific claims. They can’t then simultaneously claim rule OVER the secular, scientific world. There’s nothing “natural” about Popoid “Natural Law” (and ergo, it absolutely should NOT be a part of civic law!).

JC Fisher

[Similar, IMO, to “(human) life begins at conception”: it’s a religious claim, not a scientific fact.]

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_012
2020_013_B
2020_013_A
2020_011

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café