Support the Café

Search our Site

The Methodists are wrestling with structure too

The Methodists are wrestling with structure too

As General Convention draws near there is a growing consensus that this year the presenting issue is how to best structure the Episcopal Church to do its work as we move into a new era. We’re not the only denomination facing the challenge. The Methodist General Conference has just looked at the same question, and it didn’t go well.

In an article reporting on the conference in the Christian Century, after a discussion of growing conflict between Western and African Methodists over questions of marriage equality, comes this report:

“The larger issue before this General Conference is the proposed restructuring of the UMC. The primary plan to do so, ‘The Call to Action,’ came out of a study conducted by an outside consulting firm. The plan, which would drastically streamline church authority, later gathered the support of the Council of Bishops and a number of large churches within the connection.

There’s no question that the UMC is changing. But opponents object to the CtA’s notion that streamlining authority is the way to spur growth–and they’re troubled by the sense that these changes arise from a culture of fear and/or corporate organization.

In a rather stunning reversal, Friday morning saw the death of the CtA proposal in the General Administration Legislative Committee. After months of supporters disseminating information and garnering support for the plan, it was rejected–and the committee began amending ‘Plan B.’  Saturday night, all the plans offered were defeated, and a mood of general frustration settled set in on all sides.

Bishop Will Willimon said that this turn of events was a result of ‘the wrong people’ voting at General Conference, people brought to Tampa through elections carried out by a broken system. It remains to be seen whether General Conference 2012 will ultimately bring about any restructuring of the UMC.”

More here.

Part of the proposed restructuring was to elect one of the Methodist bishops to a role very similar to that of our Presiding Bishop’s. That resolution was defeated too.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café