Support the Café
Search our site

The Tale of two fonts!

The Tale of two fonts!

In the village in Shipton Bellinger in southern England the rector of St Peter’s church, backed by the parish warden’s and other local groups would like to get rid of it’s rather large Victorian era baptismal font. The primary argument is that in addition to being “showy,” the font is much too large for the small medieval church it calls home.

The authorities say that people have tripped over the large step on which the font stands and that after-service gatherings at the church have been “constrained by the size and position of the font.”

They argue that it is “it is much too large for a small medieval church.”

They have suggested that when removed it could be either sold or given to another church or chapel or, failing that buried in the church yard.

Unfortunately the local church folk are bucking heads with the Victorian Society and a parishioner. However, the removal has been approved by Christopher Clark, Chancellor of the Diocese of Winchester and a judge of the Church of England’s ancient Consistory Court, which must decide on major changes to CoE buildings. The Victorian Society has threatened to appeal his ruling.

 

On the other side of the world a much smaller, 1000 year old Norman baptismal font which has traveled from possibly France to England and later to New Zealand is also in search of a new home. Not because the local church members don’t like it, but due to the decommissioning of the font’s most recent home of 90 years, the Church of the Holy Trinity in Lawrence NZ by Bishop Kelvin Wright.

font

Photo:Kelvin Wright’s blog

It is only a piece of limestone, but it is also a symbol of rebirth and new beginnings. It has survived through much of the history of the Anglican Communion, and now it waits to find out how it will carry that history forward.

Bishop Wright seems dedicated to the idea of passing the font on to continue it’s historic task.

 

Parishes often run into issues when they wish to change things regarding their buildings. It can be as minor as the color of new carpeting to the decision of removing the pews and replacing them with chairs to selling the property to an developer who plans to tear down the structure. Sometimes the disagreement is in house pitting parishioners against one another. Other times it can be the majority of a congregation battling a local historic organization dedicated to keeping things the same. Do you have a short story to share regarding an attempt to change something inside or outside your parish home?

posted by David Allen

 

 

Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café