Support the Café

Search our Site

The rise of the religious left

The rise of the religious left

Reuters reports that the “religious left,” long thought to be too loose a congregation to wield political influence, is beginning to organize in the wake of last year’s election of Donald Trump to the American presidency.

Although not as powerful as the religious right, which has been credited with helping elect Republican presidents and boasts well-known leaders such as Christian Broadcasting Network founder Pat Robertson, the “religious left” is now slowly coming together as a force in U.S. politics.

This disparate group, traditionally seen as lacking clout, has been propelled into political activism by Trump’s policies on immigration, healthcare and social welfare, according to clergy members, activists and academics. A key test will be how well it will be able to translate its mobilization into votes in the 2018 midterm congressional elections.

The article cites a rise in attendance at religious progressive conferences, seminars, and rallies, and the explosion of faith communities associating themselves with the sanctuary movement to protect and promote the interests of immigrants.

“It’s one of the dirty little secrets of American politics that there has been a religious left all along and it just hasn’t done a good job of organizing,” said J. Patrick Hornbeck II, chairman of the theology department at Fordham University, a Jesuit school in New York. …

But some observers were skeptical that the religious left could equal the religious right politically any time soon.

“It really took decades of activism for the religious right to become the force that it is today,” said Peter Ubertaccio, chairman of the political science department at Stonehill College, a Catholic school outside Boston.

But the power potential of the “religious left” is not negligible. The “Moral Mondays” movement, launched in 2013 by the North Carolina NAACP’s Reverend William Barber, is credited with contributing to last year’s election defeat of Republican Governor Pat McCrory by Democrat Roy Cooper.

Read the article on Reuters. Have you witnessed a surge in progressive religious and political engagement since November’s election?

Featured image: Christ Episcopal Church, Shaker Heights, via Facebook. The Reuters article cited an increase in faith communities involved in sanctuary efforts as evidence of the mobilization of the “religious left.”


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lisa Ann Mauro

Thank you Troy for your comment. There are many of us that can’t be “put into a box” with our political views. I have great concern that our Church just assumes we all think or should think one way. It is offensive and very narrow minded.

Bruce G. Kozak

Totally agree.

Troy Haliwell

I am also liberal religiously, socially I am a moderate, and fiscally a conservative. I cannot be either “left” or “right” or “center” when you look at me as a whole. I am a married, gay, male who defies the traditional division in left-right.

I look for the religious “Left” to provide and equal and balanced view of religion as the “Right” does. We need to hear from both equally to be able to take a little from each and make it work.

Marshall Scott

My perspective is that the “Religious Right” – by which I mean particularly organizations brought together to seek influence with those elected, and sometimes also with those electing – lost its way first by pursuing single-issue influence (well, perhaps two or three), couched in a vision of a “more moral” past that was never what it was cracked up to be. So, I’m not talking about every conservative Christian here. I’m talking about the Moral Majority, the Family Research Council, etc. So, yes, the first concern was individuals creating organizations to appear powerful and to seek power; followed by a decision that the method was to be militantly anti- on a few issues, rather than concerned about a variety of issues that required balancing values.

With that in mind, no, I don’t think the Religious Left will ever be that sort of “powerful.” It is precisely because folks try to hold a variety of issues in balance that we can’t go there. Look at one of the most frequent critiques of recent progressive gatherings: “Look at all the signs! They can’t even agree on a message.” In fact there are already organizations that exist, but no sense that this progressive perspective is so much more important than that progressive perspective that we can set the latter aside.

Now, do I hope progressive religious voices can be influential? Yes, indeed, I do. I just don’t know in these days what the import or the impact of moral authority is when contrasted with political organization.

Lexiann Grant

Let’s remember that Paul and Jesus said to obey the government — that during the Roman regime even. The problem with this sanctuary issue is the illegality. If someone needs (not just wants) to come to the US why don’t the cities & churches help them do so Legally instead of breaking laws that have existed for a long time

Alan Christensen

I agree that we should do more to assist with legal immigration. As to Lexiann Grant’s point about illegality: There is a long tradition of civil disobedience in the cause of justice. Those who engage in it should be prepared to take their lumps in court, but that doesn’t make them any less right to commit acts of civil disobedience when necessary.

Ann Fontaine

Lexiann: Many came at times when promises of green cards and citizenship were made to entice them to work at jobs no one in the US would do. Others are like a friend of mine who did not want to leave his home, culture, family and friends but he was a police captain and the drug gangs (who supply drugs to the US) came to him and said work for us or we will kill your family. They cut off his finger to prove their point. He packed up his family and came north. Now he works cleaning up after dairy cows so you can have cheese and ice cream and his wife cleans hotel rooms so you can be safe and comfortable. His family is safe – some of the children are DACA registered and thriving – graduating from High School and college – some were born here. What would you do for your family? This family did not have the luxury of waiting to come “legally” nor can the go back and “get in line” — this is their only home – the children do not know any other home.

Here are some myths about immigration that you may have heard.

Pam Ostrander

I believe, correct me if I am wrong, the religious left is about to go down that same dark road. I would posit they have already done so. Group speak and group thought that is politically correct seems to be the only acceptable way to go currently within TEC from the top down. Name calling commences if questions are raised so questions are silenced.
Meanwhile, questions go unanswered. Will the center hold? The church has already split once?

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café