Support the Café
Search our site

The case for teaching kids philosophy

The case for teaching kids philosophy

Noting the deep ideological polarization of our time, writer Steve Neumann argues that the party primaries provide perfect examples of why we need to teach children philosophy; the Washington Post presents his essay as an argument in favor of bringing back philosophy before we increase the focus on computer sciences and other STEM disciplines.

Neumann is mostly concerned with teaching students how to think, not what to think; he isn’t proposing in-depth explorations of philosophical frameworks or teaching students what to think. He invokes Socrates to explain the real aim of philosophical education.

From the essay:

The focus is on asking questions because philosophy, as Socrates said, begins in wonder. We don’t just ask ourselves questions—we ask others, those who make up our society.

Neumann argues that children are more malleable than adults, and that this type of education will help raise a generation which is more open-minded and less rigid than we currently are, noting that people are so entrenched in their views now that they aren’t listening when we discuss politics or ideas.

Do you share his concern that we’re teaching children how to make a living, but not how to live? Do you think that a movement away from Socratic education is a factor in our current partisan climate?

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

10 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Shirley O'Shea

First, it is important to note that the story is about teaching elementary children critical thought. This is the joy of learning. Second, while controlling costs of higher education is important, it is even more important to close the income gap so that more people can afford a humanities education without being bankrupted by loan payments.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
James Yazell

I absolutely agree! Of course I may be a bit biased since my major was Philosophy...

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
JoS. S. Laughon

99% agree.

The one problem is in 4 year colleges, justifying this massive expense to students with a limited ROI. Once we can start controlling costs, we can start justifying ignoring the more lucrative degrees.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
John Chilton

Not so fast,

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/top-best-most/a-philosophy-degree-earns-more-than-an-accounting-degree-121403186.html

http://dailynous.com/2015/09/04/salaries-of-philosophy-majors-over-time/

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
JoS. S. Laughon

"among humanities"

Also measuring midcareer income is probably a tad unhelpful.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Anne Bay

My daughter went to a Montessori school when for her elementary school years. The Montessori method includes learning philosophy-ie. reading, studying, learning about historical influence on modern education. When she got to university, she noted she used what she had learned in Montessori regarding complex subjects-even advanced math! Some of her professors commented on her writing and how insightful she was and her critical thinking. I was fortunate to have philosophy in high school in addition to the regular curriculum. Philosophy is crucial in education.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
John Chilton

David, is that your own photo taken at the Rodin exhibit at the Virginia Museum of Fine Art?

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café