2020_010_A
Support the Café
Search our site

Temporary stay delays health law’s birth control mandate

Temporary stay delays health law’s birth control mandate

USA Today offers clear explanation of the delay issued by Justice Sonia Sotomayor:

Sotomayor acted on a request from an organization of Catholic nuns in Denver, the Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged. Its request for an emergency stay had been denied earlier in the day by a federal appeals court.

The government is “temporarily enjoined from enforcing against applicants the contraceptive coverage requirements imposed by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” Sotomayor said in the order. She gave government officials until 10 a.m. EST (1500 GMT) Friday to respond to her order.

The law requires employers to provide insurance that covers a range of preventive care, free of charge, including contraception….

Sotomayor’s decision to delay the contraceptive portion of the law was joined by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which also issued an emergency stay for Catholic-affiliated groups challenging the contraceptive provision.

The article includes the arguments from the nuns lawyers.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Woodrum

Are Christian Scientists going to be allowed to avoid the Affordable Care Act altogether? The problem of denominational purity codes could be avoided if all health care insurance was covered for all citizens by the government instead of through the present crazy patchwork.

tgflux

Ormonde, affect? Yes. Dictate? Heavens, NO!

JC Fisher

Conversely, let’s all look forward to our Jehovah’s Witness business owners denying us employees blood transfusions: “ethical consequences”.

Ormonde Plater

The religious beliefs of the nuns have ethical consequences, affecting the lives of the (probably poor) young women who work for them.

tgflux

If it was called the Profits McProfits Home for the Aged, would Sonia & SCOTUS get it?

It’s *irrelevant* that an order of nuns runs this nursing home. It’s a BUSINESS, w/ employees. And those *employees* ought to be able to make their OWN health care decisions (inc. re contraception), NOT their bosses!

JC Fisher

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café