Noticed in a sidebar illustration: Sarah Posner’s full story at Religion Dispatches on curricular intent and academic freedom at the Liberty University School of Law‘s “Foundations of Law” course is well worth a read, but our specific attention was drawn by the content of one of the course’s actual test questions from 2008 – one that, it turns out, wasn’t merely hypothetical.
Mountains and molehills?
0
0
vote
Article Rating





Hmmmmm….I wonder what the solution would be if one substituted a heterosexual relationship?
Those guldarned Christians muckin’ everything up again.
Oh! that’s not the right conclusion?
Sorry.
The way the question is presented doesn’t just suggest the sort of answer that’s expected, it bludgeons the reader with all the prejudice and judgment possible embedded in the question. I imagine any student who attempted to give even a moderate answer to this question would be failed on it.
Gobsmacked.
The stipulation of “facts” according to Liberty (?) University appears to have NO connection to the Real World.
JC Fisher