Support the Café

Search our Site

Task Force imagines the future for the Episcopal Church

Task Force imagines the future for the Episcopal Church

The Task Force for Reimagining the Episcopal Church (TREC) has issued a progress report on what they have learned so far about their work and the vision for the future. What are your thoughts on the work to date?

TREC Letter to the Church: December 10, 2013

In the last several months, the members of the Taskforce for Reimagining The Episcopal Church have been on a listening tour – in person and virtually. We have spoken with youth groups and bishops, the Executive Council and councils of local leaders; at provinces, at dioceses, parishes, and religious communities. We have asked people what their hopes and dreams are for our Church; what aspects of the Church they hope we cherish and strengthen; and what they wish we could be brave enough to let go of in order to make our Church more vibrant and mission-focused.

Our listening to the Church is an ongoing process. What we have heard is a deep, abiding love for our Church and its unique way of creating Christ-centered community and mission. The Book of Common Prayer and the beauty and mystery of our liturgy bind us together across ages, geographies and politics. We deeply love the intellectual as well as the spiritual life that is cultivated in our members (“you don’t need to leave your mind at the door”).

On many other issues, we disagree. We heard calls for the Church to be “less reactive to social issues,” and also calls to make the Church’s voice on social issues even louder. We heard calls for more diversity in our liturgy and music, and equally urgent calls for less. We would have expected nothing different! Many of us cherish the diversity of our community as much as we cherish the common beliefs and traditions that bring us together.

But there were several loud and urgent themes that consistently ran through our discussions: the Church is calling for us to reduce the bureaucracy and resource-intensity of our Church wide processes. The Church wants the work of General Convention and other Church structures to be more relevant and more life-giving to our local parish communities. And, the Church wants us to face and grapple with the tough issues and the “elephants in the room” that suck up our resources, time and energy and that block our growth.

As a taskforce, we have been reflecting on what we have heard, and the vision of a reinvigorated Episcopal Church is emerging.

A New Vision

Imagine a world where all of our Episcopal parishes are spiritually vibrant and mission-focused. A recent survey suggests that less than 30% would pass this test today. [1] Imagine a world where our parishes consistently are good at inspiring their traditional members and also are energized and effective in reaching out to new generations and new populations. Imagine a world where the shape of our Church frequently adapts, as new parish communities emerge in non-traditional places and non-traditional ways, and as existing parishes merge and reinvent as local conditions change. Imagine a world where Episcopal clergy and lay leaders are renowned for being highly effective leaders, skilled at Christian formation and community building, at new church planting, at church transformation, and at organizing communities for mission. Imagine that Episcopalians easily collaborate with each other across the Church: forming communities of interest, working together to share learnings from local initiatives, and collaborating to pool resources and ideas. Imagine that the Church wide structure of The Episcopal Church primarily serves to enable and magnify local mission through networked collaboration, as well as to lend its prophetic voice. Imagine that each triennium we come together in a “General Mission Convocation” where participants from all over the Church immerse themselves in mission learning, sharing, decision making and celebration.

Realizing this vision

It will take far more than structural changes in order to realize this new world. It will take resolved and capable leadership at all levels of the Church, and it will take broad and deep cultural change within the Church. We will have to work through a grieving process as we individually and collectively lose structures that have been critical parts of our lives and even of our identities. At the same time, we will also have to find a way of adopting a new and more hopeful mindset: we will need to believe—truly believe—that The Episcopal Church can, should and must GROW!

In our work, we will call out some of the non-structural changes that we believe will be critical to living into a new vision of a vibrant, growing and adaptive Church. We will give some suggestions for how we might go beyond structural reform to achieve these changes in leadership behaviors, culture and organizational capability.

We will focus most of our time as a taskforce on developing a set of recommendations for structural or “technical” changes that we think will be a critical part of reinvigorating the Church. These changes will play three important roles in the revitalization of our Church:

1) They will “clear the way” for innovation and adaptation, freeing up our time and energy, and speeding up decision making.

2) They will give the leadership of the Church a bold and holistic agenda of change which, if adopted, will role model the kind of similar bold changes that must occur at every other level of the Church.

3) They will reinvent the role of Church wide organizations and structures: away from “doing” mission and towards enabling mission; away from setting agendas and assigning resources and towards connecting local communities and individuals for mutual learning, support and collaboration.

What to expect from us

We have identified a number of key issues that we believe must be tackled through structural reform. We are working to develop proposals that address each of these issues. Some of these proposals will feel incremental, and many have been debated before. Some will feel bold and risky. Some of them will go beyond the scope of a narrow interpretation of the resolution that created our Taskforce (C095). Some of them go even beyond the scope of the authority of General Convention, and thus will take the form of “recommendations” or “prophetic proclamations” rather than legislative proposals. Taken together, however, alongside the many exciting, vibrant, and hopeful things already emerging around the Church, we believe that our proposals will be part of the ongoing work of setting the Church on a new path towards health and vitality.

Some of the areas in which we are developing recommendations include:

1) The role and mechanics of General Convention: Narrowing the legislative agenda and reducing the size of its legislative bodies, while expanding the scope of our get-togethers so that they serve not only as places where key legislation is debated and adopted but also as vibrant, open and inclusive celebratory Mission Convocations—bringing together passionate and active practitioners of every kind of mission going on around the Church.

2) Roles and accountability of the Presiding Officers and of the Executive Council–particularly as related to Church wide staff: Establishing simple and clear lines of accountability and responsibility, reducing redundancy, clarifying confusions which can inhibit clear decision-making processes, and resizing the Council to function more effectively as a governance board.

3) Breadth of CCABs (Committees, Commissions, Agencies and Boards) and the creation of alternative, fresh and creative models for Church wide collaboration: Recasting most of our CCABs into a new model of distributive and accountable collaboration. Creating on-line collaboration models that connect local mission leaders across our Church so that our collective “agenda” can dynamically adapt to local needs, and so that we tap into the greatest asset of our Church—all of us, sitting in the pews, doing great work locally but mostly disconnected from each other and from The Episcopal Church.

4) Number of dioceses: Considering a one-time, objective process for establishing norms for a healthy and viable diocesan size and structure in order to enable mission and reduce the complexity of our organization.

5) Capacity and leadership development: Establishing effective leadership formation and development approaches for all orders of ministry, grounded in our vows of baptism and ordination, as well as in the particular needs of the 21st century. Calling out the implications for clergy career paths and deployment, as well as the implications and opportunities for seminaries and other current leadership development programs. Encouraging the creation of new “centers of excellence” or other mechanisms for fostering ongoing learning and large-scale capability building, encouraging networking around existing nodes of great work.

It is also clear that there is a deeply felt need to develop some common understandings of how individual dioceses can best make decisions about, and provide the best support for, parish vitality and viability. Given how vastly different the cultural and demographic landscape has become since most of our congregations were founded and buildings constructed, how do we make the most faithful and strategic use of our resources as we make decisions about the number of parishes, locations, consolidations, new plants, etc.? This work is largely in the hands of local dioceses rather than the General Convention, but we hope that our work will contain some reflections and recommendations that may be taken up by the whole church around these pressing and critical issues as well.

What we need from you

We have a huge and complex scope of work, and we need your help! Please keep talking with us and giving us feedback and ideas. If you have not convened a discussion with our Engagement Kit, or completed our on-line questionnaire, please do so! If you have reactions to our Episcopal Identity and Vision paper posted on our website, please send us your feedback and ideas. We are revising it with the feedback we have already received and will continue to revise it as we gather additional input. Please send us your feedback and ideas regarding this letter.

Going forward, please watch for drafts of recommendations around the areas of reform that we have highlighted in this note. We will post installments around our ideas as quickly as we can, beginning in late January 2014, to enable as much discussion, debate and feedback as possible. We will continue to post updates to our evolving proposals through the course of the year, as we work towards finalizing our work in late 2014. In addition, we are in the process of planning a special gathering of the Church in the fall of 2014 to further discuss our proposals and to receive feedback. In line with our vision to live into new ways to “do Church” in the 21st century, this meeting will be virtual, so that we can involve as broad and diverse a group as possible, without restricting access to those who don’t have the financial resources to join an in-person gathering.

Finally, please pray for us and for all who are engaging with us, as we try our best to discern the right path for our Church. You might use the prayer that members of our Taskforce have written for us:

Holy Spirit, who broods over the world, fill the hearts and minds of your servants on Taskforce for Reimagining The Episcopal Church with wisdom, clarity and courage. Work in them as they examine and recommend reforms for the structure, governance and administration of this branch of the one holy catholic and apostolic Church. Help them propose reforms to more effectively proclaim by word and example the Good News of God in Christ, to challenge the world to seek and serve Christ in all persons—loving our neighbors as ourselves and to be a blazing light for the kind of justice and peace that leads to all people respecting the dignity of every human being. Be with The Episcopal Church that we all may be open to the challenges that this Taskforce will bring to us—and help the whole church to discern your will for our future. In the name of Jesus Christ our Mediator, on whose life this Church was founded. AMEN

Thank you for the trust you have placed in us, and in the input you have already provided. Thank you in advance for the input and vigorous debate that we hope will mark the next phase of our work with you.

For more info, questions or comments, contact TREC members at

[1] David Roozen, “A Decade of Change in American Congregations: 2000-2010,” Hartford Institute for Religion Research, 2011.

TREC Engagement Kit


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Perhaps I’m just slow, but I have no idea what things like “Recasting most of our CCABs into a new model of distributive and accountable collaboration” or “Encouraging the creation of new “centers of excellence” or other mechanisms for fostering ongoing learning and large-scale capability building, encouraging networking around existing nodes of great work” actually mean.

I spent years in government service and corporate consulting, and this all sounds like the same buzzword-filled rhetoric I heard in those environments. Not only do we need French and Spanish translations, plain English would be helpful as well.

I applaud and second Adam Spencer’s comment. We need to discern how God is calling us to do God’s work given our unique gifts and heritage as The Episcopal Church. And then we need to figure out practical ways to support that vocation, primarily at the parish and diocesan levels. I realize neither task is simple, but surely they can be more straightforward than the current approach.

Julie Murdoch+

tobias haller

Also, I am not really sure who would have the authority to reform General Convention rather than General Convention itself.

Jim, that sums up the dilemma I was trying to describe. I’ve seen many carefully and wisely worked through proposals come to General Convention only to be trashed debated to the point of no longer representing anything like the initial proposal. I’ve seen the same thing happen to bad ideas, too, and I realize that it is our “process” — but it is a significant obstacle unless TREC can get the huddled masses in Salt Lake City to sing from their hymnbook. I hope they can… but seeing some specifics (i.e. amendments to the Constitution to open even the possibility of subsequent change) would help encourage me, and likely others, to believe that real change is in the future.

Mallory Holding

So my opinion may be irrelevant since I won’t even be a Chreaster this year – but I was at General Convention when they voted to form this group and my impression was that it was supposed to be new and innovative and think out of the box. Yet as a I read through the report I just couldn’t get past the thought that this was a report that could have been shared with the Episcopal Church 10, 20 or 30 years in the past. The presentation of information is pretty traditional and uses words that I always see the Church throw around like ‘mission.’ It was really hard for me to get past that and even consider the ideas. And even then theres not a whole lot of new or exciting ideas here

As an aside – One other thing that I was curious about as I overviewed it and past TREC docs is just what parts of the church they are reaching out too. I have relationships with members of the church in Haiti who weren’t made aware of chances to participate in the surveys and didn’t have access to documents in French. Even this letter will be translated into Spanish but not French. I struggle to come to grips with a church that is supposed to be inclusive, but can’t translate documents or seek out opinions from their largest diocese. Haiti is one example, but I am curious about how much outreach was made to the parts of TEC outside of the continental U.S.

Lastly – I find their phrasing of “new world” interesting rather than “new church” or something else. One of the problems I’ve heard come up again and again in the Church is that it can’t adapt to the world it is living in now…so if we can’t grasp and adapt to the world we are currently living, what business do we have creating a “new world”


It’s Advent. In addition to the Homeless Memorial service held last night and the Guadalupe Celebration tonight we have ten Advent services to prepare for as we get ready for four on Christmas Eve and one on Christmas Day.

And an End Gun Violence vigil on Saturday with the Mayors Against Gun Violence and Sandy Hook Promise.

So I don’t have time to read this whole thing right now.

What I did read stopped me at “inspiring their traditional members.” [New Vision]

Who are your traditional members? Ours are third and fourth generation Episcopalians who expect church to revelant, activist and pastoral not just to the people in the pews but to the stranger at the gate.

Would love to have more conversation on this later. After we get baby Jesus safely in the manger again. Cheers!

The Reverend Canon Susan Russell

All Saints Church, Pasadena

Jim Naughton

Tobias, I think that TREC will arrive at General Convention with a fair amount of political capital, and that some changes that the convention was nervous about making in the past will have a far better chance of being adopted. Regarding CCABs, for instance, I think legislation to do something like what the TREC letter is suggesting would have passed at the last convention had this major restructuring effort not been about to commence.

My concerns are that TREC will damage its credibility pre-convention by overreaching–restricting the topics on which Convention can legislate, for instance– or making recommendations that clearly diminish the authority of one order at the expense of the other.

Also, I am not really sure who would have the authority to reform General Convention rather than General Convention itself.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café