2020_010_A
Support the Café
Search our site

Task force begins work the meaning of episcopacy in 2017.

Task force begins work the meaning of episcopacy in 2017.

A task force studying the ministry of bishops is working on “What does the church in 2017 need in bishops?” The Task Force on the Episcopacy was established by Resolution D004 of the 2015 General Convention.

Deputy News:

“There is a confluence of issues influencing our work,” says the Very Rev. Gary Hall, a retired dean of Washington National Cathedral who serves on the task force’s canonical issues sub-committee. “Heather Cook and the lack of disclosure to the electing body is one. Another is figuring out what we need to do to make sure that we don’t have a pattern of bishop elections with diverse slates, but not diverse results. And the third is clarifying to whom the bishop formation process is accountable.”

Bishop Ian Douglas of Connecticut, a four-time deputy before his election as bishop in 2009, chairs the task force. “Everyone who’s on this task force is committed to the Episcopal Church being episcopally led and synodically governed,” he says. “We’re asking how we can support bishops to be the best leaders they can be.”

The canons, say both Douglas and Hall, are at the heart of the task force’s work. “What do they say and where do they conflict with current practice? We have some extracanonical practices out there,” Douglas says, referring to the appointment of assisting bishops, which are not included in the church’s canons, and the election of bishops over age 72, the mandatory retirement age, to serve as bishops provisional. “We’d like clarity around canonical boundaries, and also to understand how the canons can encourage bishops to be healthy, whole and collaborative leaders in the new church and world.”

“We need to enforce the existing canons or change the canons,” Hall says. The task force may propose legislative resolutions to General Convention, canonical changes, or administrative guidance on how dioceses can conform to the canons, he says. “We might think about proposing models that don’t exist now, and there might be things happening that aren’t kosher according to the canons, but that General Convention might proactively want to make possible.”

A major topic of discussion was the issue of mentoring and formation for those discerning a call to the episcopacy, an idea that created something of social media storm when it was first proposed:

While much of the online conversation centered on the fear that current bishops were trying to restrict the pool of potential future bishops, the proposal, says task force member Alexandra Killenwald, intends just the opposite.

The idea under consideration, she says, is based on research about the kinds of structures that can help facilitate better representation of women and people of color in leadership. Killenwald, who chairs the task force’s working group on diversity, is professor of sociology at Harvard University and junior warden at Christ Episcopal Church in Waltham, Massachusetts.

Research indicates that when women and men look at the same job advertisements to see if they’re qualified, women hold themselves to a higher standard than do men, she says. A professional development and mentoring program would be “a way to say to women and people of color, hey, let’s just try this out, and see how it goes.

“If you can choose to participate in this program,” Killenwald says, “it would provide an entry point that gives folks a way to get experience and to explore a career calling and questions about being a bishop more generally” before discerning a call to a particular diocese….

The other topic discussed was the issue of diversity in Episcopal elections.

The motivation for seeking diversity in the House of Bishops is both practical and justice-oriented, Killenwald says. “Sometimes when we talk about diversity, we think that the goal is that the bishops should match the church’s demographics. But the motivation for diversity is not just about representation. There is research that suggests that diverse groups make better decisions, and that’s independent from how many people in the church have a particular attribute.

“It’s not about how many women bishops or bishops of color is enough. We don’t know what number is enough, but we’re pretty sure that it’s more than we have now, and the fact that people are missing is a function of discrimination—some in the church, and some in the broader social systems that keep some people from even walking through doors of Episcopal Church.”

 

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

13 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jay Croft

Western Kansas tried, but in 2014 the bishop went full-time to his episcopal duties.

Prof Christopher Seitz

There are almost 300 parishes in the Diocese in Europe (not ‘of’). It is the largest diocese in the Anglican Communion, stretching from Russia to Spain. It is adminstered from Brussels and London and with a network of area Archdeacons. There are more than 50 parishes in France alone, where I live.

The American Convocation has around a dozen parishes and missions *in total*, most former chaplaincies.

In the context of a discussion about too many dioceses in the Episcopal Church, a ‘merger’ of two very different entities in Europe solves nothing and is comparing apples and oranges. The TEC bishop in Europe is an honorary Bishop in the Diocese in Europe. The Diocese in Europe has obvious challenges due to its scale already and now Brexit.

Since 40% of TEC diocese have 4K ASA or below, merging dioceses seems like an inevitability. This would be made easier by a new canon allowing parties other than the principals to make those decisions. I expect this is in the pipeline as dioceses become more and more agents of General Convention.

Jeff Cox

We need fewer Dioceses. The Episcopacy is too expensive for small Diocese. Also, need prophetic leaders to look ecumenically for answers. Start in Europe to combine the Convocation and CoE Diocese of Europe.

Eric Bonetti

Agree, with one caveat: Many dioceses are woefully bloated. We don’t need a cathedral for each and every diocese, or 20-30 staffers. There are many dioceses that can share a bishop and cathedral, disciplinary committees, and other structures. And in some cases, we may need to look at whether there should be bi-vocational bishops. Good for the goose, good for the gander.

Ann Fontaine

Western Kansas has tried this http://www.diowks.org/our-bishop

Jay Croft

Not sure about the need for fewer dioceses. Some of them are really huge (Oklahoma, for example) and bishops have to spend a lot of time behind the wheel. Alaska is probably the largest diocese in geographical area.

England is indeed bloated with bishops, prebendaries, canons and whatnot. But at least they are manageable in terms of geographical areas.

Tom Little

To Jay Croft’s comment: The photograph accompanying this blog post is not a photograph of the Task Force.

Jay Croft

So: it’s still quite “pale.”

Eric Bonetti

There is a real need, as well, for the Episcopacy to understand its role in setting boundaries around clergy misconduct. While the default can and should be collaborative leadership, the whole concept of a representative democracy means that bishops must be empowered to take decisive action when parts of the church are not healthy.

Jay Croft

I remember one clergy conference in Alabama where Bishop Parsley stated, “We’re going to talk about clergy conduct, not clergy misconduct.”

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café