Support the Café
Search our site

Staff prepares talking points on UTO controversy for House of Bishops

Staff prepares talking points on UTO controversy for House of Bishops

At the request of several bishops, the Church Center staff recently provided the House of Bishops with “talking points” regarding the recent controversy involving the board of the United Thank Offering. As you may recall four members of the UTO board resigned in protest over what they viewed as the Church Center staff’s attempt to erode the independence of the UTO and weaken its relationship to the Episcopal Church Women.


We have received a copy, and are publishing it here because it represents the best distillation we have seen of the Church Center staff’s take on the controversy. Executive Council will take up the matter when it meets next week in Chicago.

We don’t know nearly enough to attempt to weigh the competing claims that the senior staff at Church Center and the women who resigned from the board have made about the events that led to their resignations. We’d note, though, that logic alone does not prevent one from believing that the business practices of the UTO could stand improvement and that the Church Center team overreached in attempting to provide it.

One unfortunate feature of the document is the self-exculpatory quality of the first talking point. The Church Center’s senior staff released to the wider church an unsigned account of the controversy that was questionable in some of its assertions and regrettable in its tone. The account of the controversy was made accessible via a link from Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori’s statement on the UTO controversy, which, in most other ways, struck the right notes. The link led to a Word document that, according to data stored in the document, was written in the Word program registered to Bishop Stacy Sauls, the church’s chief operating officer. By following the same link, one also arrived at private correspondence sent from the former UTO board members to the Church Center team. This correspondence was released without the UTO members’ permission and cast the UTO members in a negative light.

To blame the controversy that surrounds the UTO resignations on “many comments, statements, charges, and allegations have been presented about UTO board actions, both by former board members and in subsequent discussion in the public forum” without acknowledging the role of the senior staff at the Church Center is misleading. The release of the former UTO leaders’ correspondence was an abuse of power that startled people who have no particular opinion about the UTO controversy, but who do not believe that the senior staff should use the communications tools of the wider church to shame and embarrass political adversaries.

Talking points for the House of Bishops concerning the United Thank Offerings

Over the past few weeks many comments, statements, charges, and

allegations have been presented about UTO board actions, both by

former board members and in subsequent discussion in the public forum.

Much confusion and misunderstanding have resulted. Both the

Presiding Bishop and the President of the House of Deputies have

issued statements on this situation.

The United Thank Offering is an important ministry in The Episcopal

Church, which continues to be led by women of The Episcopal Church.

Its mission-oriented work, grounded in gratitude, will continue.

The level of confusion is deeply regrettable. A season of healing,

deep listening, and renewal is essential.

The following is an overview of actions.

· Drafts of new bylaws and a Memorandum of Understanding were

put forward by Episcopal Church leadership as part of a process agreed

to by the United Thank Offering board. The proposal would establish

standard business and fiduciary practices expected in the life of the

Church. These actions, in turn, will make the United Thank Offering

more accountable and transparent, especially to those who give.

· From its very beginning, the UTO has worked in partnership

with the churchwide Department of Mission.

· A regular review of UTO practices, procedures, and methods

showed the need for fiduciary guidelines and sound business practices,

aligned with expectations of all Episcopal Church ministries. These

include such matters as a) conflicts of interest, b) the need for

authorized budgets for travel and meeting expenses, c) the need for

legal and authorized contracts with vendors, d) recognition that legal

representation is the responsibility of DFMS, d) board practices that

meet churchwide expectations of transparency, and e) the need to

include all members, both elected and appointed, in all meetings and

communications. Irregularities need to be addressed for the on-going

health of the United Thank Offering, and compliance with secular law.

· Accusations that revisions will sever the relationship

between UTO and The Episcopal Church Women are simply not correct.

· The granting process has not been assumed by DFMS, nor has

this been proposed. As UTO is an integral part of DFMS, DFMS and the

Executive Council have a responsibility to exercise prudent oversight

to further the overall mission of UTO.

· The Executive Council will discuss this situation at its

upcoming meeting in October.

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ann Fontaine

And if anyone believes there will be no change in the relationship - read this analysis.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Ann Fontaine

For other points of view read the letters and memories of the events by the UTO Board here.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café