Support the Café

Search our Site

Spiritual explorers and base camps

Spiritual explorers and base camps

According to Gallup, church membership is down while (self-reported) religious observance is up. Why the disconnect? Episcopal Bishop Greg Rickel says that the 20th century model of the big-staff, big-program church is no longer normative nor sustainable in a world characterized by loose connections and informal networking. Congregations will need to think about membership in new ways. Rickel says we need to think of congregations as base camps for spiritual explorer.

Rickel and others say in the Christian Century, that people are thinking about affiliation differently that we did in the middle of the last century, so churches will need new ways of thinking about membership.

Despite the changing patterns of church affiliation, most churches still approach membership the way they did in the 1960s. New attendees are encouraged to attend a class to learn about the history and theology of the denomination and of the local congregation, with the expectation that they will join the church. But if new modes of affiliation are appearing, churches will need new ways of thinking about membership.

Rickel, an Episcopal bishop in Washington State, thinks that churches do not yet know how to measure what this means. “What denominational metrics people are asking—how many people are in church on Sunday, for example—may not be the right measure for today. The measures that contemporary churches need may be more intuitive and more spiritual in nature.”

Rickel points to a small church in his diocese that is located along the Columbia River. The population of the area is declining, and membership growth is not a realistic goal. Never­theless, the congregation is a dynamic and important part of the community, because it is a community and service center. Rickel likens it to a base camp—a place along the journey where people stop to receive nourishment, training, basic supplies and encouragement.

“We’ve only been paying attention,” Rickel said, “to the people who stay. But maybe that’s not the purpose [of the base camp]. Maybe we’ve been treating base camps as permanent residences.”

In order to operate as base camps, Rickel said, congregations need not give up their identity or cease offering a challenging “rule for living.” In fact, he said, young adults are eager for such a challenge. But churches need to be able to witness to the gospel when they have only a few chances to reach any one person.

This is the key to the era we are entering, said sociologist Wade Clark Roof. “Local congregations have to take into account the fact that they may only have a one-time shot. Churches will need to put new emphasis on touching people’s lives instead of gaining new members. These are two different enterprises.”

Institutions, Roof noted, want to count people. They want to report growth. But they may not be able to do that in the way they once did. Their assessment of vitality will have to take a different form.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Just one thought (and if I’m thinking of it, I’m sure it’s already being done): Online-formation. Interactive. For Youth and Adult Baptism, and Confirmation. [I think this distance-formation optimally should lead to some face time, pre-sacrament, but not required.]

JC Fisher

Tom Sramek Jr

The “revenue model” is that those who elect to stay and sustain the base camp are going to need to give more without expecting folks that walk through to the door to be sustaining members. Conversely, if there is a stream of one-time visitors, I don’t think we need to be shy about saying “we’re providing a base-camp for your spiritual journey. Please support us with a donation.”

I don’t think we need to be thinking about “closing churches that are producing a service dividend to the community” unless they are simply providing the service while being disconnected from that community. Churches that are turned entirely inward and are declining should be closed. Churches that are continually weaving themselves into their communities should not.

John B. Chilton

I Like this, but what’s the revenue model?

I do believe we need to thinking, too, about closing churches that are producing a service dividend to the community. We spend too much on churches at the end of their life.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café