Support the Café

Search our Site

South East Asia endorses Anglican Covenant

South East Asia endorses Anglican Covenant

ACNS reports that the Province of South East Asia adopted the Anglican Covenant.

The Church of the Province of South East Asia has adopted the Anglican Communion Covenant saying that “In acceding to the Anglican Communion Covenant, we (Diocese or Province) are seeking with other Covenanting Provinces and Dioceses to express our communion with the Triune God and with one another, to guard the boundary-markers of the good deposit of the faith once for all delivered, and to be faithful witnesses of the Gospel of Jesus Christ in the fellowship we have with God and one another, and in common mission and ministry to the world.”

South East Asia is the fourth Anglican Communion Province to officially adopt the Covenant, the others being The Anglican Church of Mexico, The Church of the Province of Myanmar and The Church in the Province of the West Indies.

The Province released a statement detailing the background to their decision.

They point out the similarity between parts of the Covenant and the final text of the Kuala Lumpur Statement of 1997

2. In her December 2009 Meeting, the Standing Committee of the Anglican Communion approved the final text of the Anglican Communion Covenant for distribution to the Provinces of the Anglican Communion. The Provinces were asked to formally consider the Anglican Communion Covenant for adoption through appropriate processes. In the words of the Anglican Communion Covenant:

The Covenant operates to express the common commitments and mutual accountability which hold each Church in the relationship of communion one with another. Recognition of, and fidelity to, this Covenant, enable mutual recognition and communion. Participation in the Covenant implies a recognition by each Church of those elements which must be maintained in its own life and for which it is accountable to the Churches with which it is in Communion in order to sustain the relationship expressed in this Covenant.(4.2.1)

3. These words bear strong resemblance to the closing appeal in the Second South-to-South Encounter Kuala Lumpur Statement in 1997, where the need for accountability was also noted:

We further challenge our Anglican Churches to …guard the internal unity of our Communion. We therefore call on the Primates, the Anglican Consultative Council and the Lambeth Conference to take the necessary steps to establish such new structures (or reinforce old ones) that will strengthen the bonds of affection between our provinces, and especially, make for effective mutual accountability in all matters of doctrine and polity throughout the Communion.(7.2, 3)

The Province still declares themselves as being out of communion with the Episcopal Church. Not surprisingly they mainly focus on the disciplinary aspects of the Covenant.

15. The Anglican Communion Covenant offers a concrete platform in ordering the Churches in the Anglican Communion to be a Communion with a clear ecclesial identity. This is why global South Churches embraced the concept of the Anglican Communion Covenant when it was first proposed (South-to-South Encounter, Third Trumpet, 22). Global South Primates have participated actively in the drafting processes.

So what about “The Historic Episcopate, locally adapted in the methods of its administration to the varying needs of the nations and peoples called of God into the unity of His Church?” Forget about it. They believe that most of the Anglican Communions problems can be fixed if only local provinces would not go around picking their own bishops based on local needs.

Churches that accede to the Anglican Communion Covenant need to subject their common life to the reforming and transforming work of the Holy Spirit, so that the Communion may be built up until all “reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ” (Eph 4: 13). The Anglican Communion should adopt more uniform processes in the election and appointment of bishops, to ensure that such processes are not held hostage to local politics and to parochial understandings of the episcopal office.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michel Alexandre Salim, AOJN

@ Grandmère Mimi

Interesting, I didn’t look into that issue in detail, but it seems that technically speaking, whenever visiting my folks in Indonesia I cannot take communion at the Anglican Church in Jakarta:

“At the same time, the Province remains in fellowship with the faithful believers within ECUSA who rightly oppose and reject the erroneous actions of their house.”

Well, I do not oppose nor reject that action since I don’t think it’s erroneous. At least the Sydney Anglican vicar of the English-language church there never brought the issue up…

tobias haller

Church of Ireland has now also “subscribed” the Covenant.

Len C

I keep thinking these folks might be just as happy if they beat us with 100 lashes and/or confined us to a goolish solitare for 20 (or death, which ever comes first)years– surely we (LGBTI Anglicans worldwide) would repent faster (not make them think about reality) and love better (more heterosexually) with some wicked remover bamboo reeds thrust under our fingernails. UNCLE!

Leonardo Ricardo


Gene Robinson was not appointed. Some folks still don’t seem to understand our process for choosing bishops.

Same old rhetoric – “faith handed down”, “tear in the fabric of the Communion” (deep tear!), “undermine Scripture”, blah, blah, blah….The province has already broken Communion with TEC and the Diocese of Westminster in the ACofC, and the covenant will fix the Communion how? By making our expulsion official, as they see it.

We’re told that churches will still be autonomous, that nothing will change with the covenant. But wait! Not only must we change the way we choose bishops, but we must rescind our actions. How? Deconsecrate bishops? Declare same-sex partnerships unblessed?

June Butler

Lionel Deimel

Well, the South East Asia statement is hardly something to be celebrated. If nothing else, it makes it obvious that the Covenant will, at least in the short term, resolve nothing. If TEC adopts it, we will fight over interpretation of the Covenant, and we will fight over the interpretation of the Bible. In the end, we will likely be reduced to second-tier Communion membership anyway. Why not just start there, let others fight out what is to become of the Communion, and be around to pick up the pieces after all parties have exhausted themselves.

The Covenant is a bad idea, and TEC’s adopting it would be an even worse idea.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café