Support the Café

Search our Site

Sister Megan Rice sabotage charges overturned

Sister Megan Rice sabotage charges overturned

Getty Images

An appeals court has overturned charges of sabotage against Sister Megan Rice, 85 years old, and two men who broke into a nuclear facility as part of a protest. The Circuit Appeals Court stated that “Congress never intended to punish individuals whose sole intent was to spread a message of peace, which is far from trying to disrupt nuclear defense systems.”

The nun and the two men are still guilty on lesser charges, but they may be released with time served. They’ve been in prison since 2014, with Rice in a severely overcrowded facility in Brooklyn, where she shares a single room with 111 other women. The NY Daily News ran an expose referring to Rice’s prison as a “hellhole”.

The BBC and other outlets have all reported on this latest development.

What do you think about the punishment? Does it seem cruel and unusual? Would you risk this type of consequence to make a similar statement?

Posted by David Streever


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David Murray

Good for the sister. However, I see nothing of working for the cause with this action. Instead, I see foolish and the court rightly acted thus with the silly.

If the prison was ‘a hellhole’, that is an issue of itself for concern and possible action, but not because the sister was in it.


Happy for Sr. Megan, but I find the ruling weird, to say the least. “Breaking in,” for almost any reason, intrinsically compromises the security and safety of the system. And I would dare say, given the chance, most intruders, even radical pacifists, would intend to disrupt the system, if they could — not break in to NO “active” end.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café