Support the Café

Search our Site

Secular Christians

Secular Christians

Friends of Jake blog discusses the ideas in a new book called “Faitheist” that argues for non-believers and people of faith to work together. Quoting from Patheos, FOJ writes:

Here’s a new entry to the discussion, from an atheist’s blog on Patheos, that actively advocates for a secular Christian identity that would mirror that of the secular Jewish community (Judaism is particularly welcoming of its nonbelievers).

Consider what this might be like. A secular Christian—I could be a candidate, for example—might go to church for the beautiful or traditional or inspiring music. The church building might be a draw, whether it were awe-inspiring or quaint. Sermons about finding the right path or avoiding the shallow temptations in life or even Bible stories might be edifying. Services could mark the important events in life such as births, marriages, and deaths. Whether the secular Christian went weekly or only a few times a year, the community of good people, eager to help others, would be welcoming. It might give focus to good works, providing opportunities for volunteering and direction for charitable giving.

But—and here’s the interesting bit—secular Christians would reject the supernatural origin of Christianity, would be open about their atheism, and would be accepted within the church community. The Christian church has millions of members who are secular Christians except for the last bit. They’ve lost their faith in the supernatural claims, they’ve admitted this to themselves, but they can’t come out to their church community. The concept of a secular Christian would allow these people to keep their community, charitable, and even family connections.

The Christian church isn’t pleased with these ex-Christians simply leaving the church, and this broadening of the church community, as is done in many Jewish communities, could provide a soft landing for many mainstream churches hurting for members. Conservatives will insist that a no-compromise position be taken, but the church is determined to evolve, and this direction seems to be a win-win.

Speaking of her own experience as a non-believer who attends church:

I’m a non-believing member of an Episcopal Parish. Indeed, I’m technically “legal” as a member: As a child, I was baptised and confirmed Roman Catholic. I had a good religious education (Catholic school through 8th grade). Now, as an adult, I not only attend services but donate time and treasure to the Episcopal Church.

Probably the main difference between me and other people who might fit this description is that I’m not in the closet about my lack of belief (although I admit I’m hesitant about telling people I don’t know well, in case they take it the wrong way or think I’m being disrespectful, which I am at pains to avoid). I don’t take Communion, and while I enjoy the service, generally I don’t say the words or sing the hymns.

Is there a place for people who are “culturally Christian” in church?


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ann Fontaine

A follow-up blog post from FOJ.

Harriet Baber

Dr. Roberts, I’d estimate that about 40% of Episcopal clergy are atheists. I’m not surprised. And I’m not recommending firing them. It’s just, IMHO unfortunate.

Theism isn’t just stupid. It’s an intellectual possibility though, as I said, highly speculative. And currently it isn’t respectable in polite society. So I’d hope that the church could maintain clergy as believers, to reassure those of us who are theists that it isn’t just stupid.

Don’t you get it? That religious belief is not respectable? That among educated, upper middle class people it’s regarded with contempt? We need someone, somewhere to say it’s ok.

Dave Paisley

Pretty much describes the Church of England for the last fifty years or so.

Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

Lucia Lloyd

I think Unitarian Universalist congregations are already providing exactly what this blogger is looking for. Many Quaker meetings do too.


If I felt welcome like this I think I would come back to the brick and mortar church. I’ve been an online-only Episcopalian for 7 or 8 years because this was the only way to keep up the identity and find some sustenance while at the same time processing my own disbelief. But I do miss church and would love to feel welcome to come back like this. I doubt that it could happen, though. Perhaps I have one of those drafts upstairs that Mr. Bergen discusses, above. In that case it is my draft and not something that most believers would be comfortable with.

And Dr Baber, you might be surprised how many clergy I personally know who would fit in the category of non-believers. I wonder if you would pack them up and send them out? Behavior I expect from Rome, not from Episcopalians.

(Dr., since we are insisting on titles now, it seems) Dennis Roberts


Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café