Support the Café

Search our Site

SC bill targets refugees and the (mostly faith-based) organizations sponsoring them

SC bill targets refugees and the (mostly faith-based) organizations sponsoring them

A bill has passed the South Carolina Senate that requires two things of organizations sponsoring immigrants to the state: one, that they register them with the Department of Social Services, and two – the requirement that has prompted protest – that they be held legally responsible if the refugees they’ve sponsored commit crimes or terrorist acts after coming to the U.S. The Washington Post:

“I fear this may be the start of similar nationwide legislation,” said Jenny Yang, vice president of advocacy and policy at World Relief, an evangelical humanitarian nonprofit group that helps resettle refugees who have been vetted and approved under a federal program run by the State Department.

Although World Relief and many evangelicals in the state have opposed the legislation, many of its Senate supporters belong to evangelical churches, highlighting a growing split within evangelicalism over immigration and refugee issues.

Alan Cross, a Southern Baptist minister opposed to the bill, noted that six of the bill’s eight co-sponsors are Southern Baptists. The bill’s evangelical opponents have charged it violates their religious freedom.

Yang called the bill “wrongheaded,” “grotesque” and “anti-faith” and said World Relief worries that if passed, the bill would “infringe on our ability to carry out our mission, which is a matter of carrying out our faith and practicing our religion, to help people who are vulnerable.”

Many of the state’s refugees have been heavily vetted by the State Department, says Jason Lee:

Jason Lee, director of World Relief’s South Carolina office in Spartanburg, said more than 80 percent of refugees the group had resettled in the state have been Christians, some of them fleeing religious persecution. None of the refugees World Relief has resettled in the state have come from Syria, and only a handful of refugees from other countries have been Muslim.

Two Republican senators from Spartanburg County were among the co-sponsors of the bill, and a Democrat from the county voted for it. In the Spartanburg Herald-Journal:

One church assisting refugees with food, clothing and services is New Life Deliverance Worship Center in Spartanburg.

The church’s senior pastor, Bunty Desor, said if the bill passes it will be a big issue, but it won’t stop his church from helping refugees.

“With the refugees we’ve adopted as a church, I have no doubt they’re going to be successful in the United States,” he said. “We’re safe with the refugees we do have in Spartanburg and they’ve been assets to us.”

About 30 of the local refugees attend classes at the Adult Learning Center in Spartanburg, which provides basic literacy skills, computer and pre-employment training, English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) and GED and pre-GED prep.

Jana White, an ESOL coordinator and English teacher at the Adult Learning Center, said making refugees register would be treating them as if they are criminals.

“The USCIS (United States Citizenship and Immigration Services) has the address and personal information on every refugee who enters,” White said. “If this information needs to be shared confidentially with our State Bureau of Investigation, that’s fine, but to publish their names and addresses would not only invade their privacy but could make them targets of ignorant hate groups.”

Photo from SCETV.

Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Woodrum

Two Republicans sponsored the bill and one Democrat voted for it? Why can’t anyone say plainly that it was sponsored and voted for by Republicans and against by Democrats? In an election year, that is more significant than religious affiliation.

Dirk Reinken

Interesting contrast to a story today on NPR’s morning edition in which Governor Herbert of Utah (Republican) explains that his state’s active commits to refugee hospitality is rooted in the refugee experience of the area’s Mormon founders. He noted the quote from Matthew 25:35: “When I was a stranger, you took me in.”

Not sure how links work here:
http://www.npr.org/2016/03/30/472365235/gov-herbert-on-why-utah-has-embraced-refugees-over-the-years

Two red states taking two vastly different approaches to faith-based refugee resettlement

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café