Support the Café
Search our site

Samuel’s Warning

Samuel’s Warning

Thursday, June 23, 2011 — Week of Proper 7, Year One

Today’s Readings for the Daily Office (Book of Common Prayer, p. 972)

Psalms 105:1-22 (morning) 105:23-45 (evening)

1 Samuel 8:1-22

Acts 6:15 – 7:16

Luke 22:24-30

What a contrast of leadership images.

In our reading from Luke today, Jesus tells his followers to be servant leaders. “The greatest among you must become like the youngest, and the leader like one who serves. …I am among you as one who serves.” (Lk. 22:26b, 27c)

In our reading from 1 Samuel today, Samuel warns the people what they will get if they choose a king to rule over them rather than choosing God’s rule. The king will have retainers and advance men, laborers for his benefit and for the means of war, luxuries and prime real estate, the best of everything and a piece of everyone’s possessions. The ruler will disburse his wealth and power among his own class, among the wealthy and powerful. Samuel’s description sounds like what became reality during the reign of Solomon.

At first blush, someone might read this passage as a warning against the oppressions of government. And that is not an unfaithful reading, especially when government becomes oppressive. The description fits as a critique of many oligarchies, where a ruling elite holds control over the masses.

But as I try to project Samuel’s description into our present reality in this country, it seems to be a fit description of a kind of plutocracy that controls and influences so much in our nation today. It is the super-wealthy today — financiers and corporate powers — who have the luxuries and prime real estate, who benefit from war and get a piece of everyone’s possessions.

The richest 1% of Americans own 90% of all stocks and bonds and the wealthiest 10% now earn more than the entire 90% of our population combined. In the past 25 years, our economy more than doubled in dollar values, yet 90% of Americans saw their incomes fall by an average of about $4,000. The income of the wealthiest 0.01% jumped 384%. Bill Moyers calls that “wage repression.”

I’m nearly sixty years old. For the first thirty years of my life, the rest of us — the lower 90 percent — could make a good living and hope for improvement. Between 1950 and 1980 average income for 9 out of 10 Americans grew from $17,719 to $30,941, a 75% increase in income in constant 2008 dollars. That egalitarian growth stopped beginning around 1980. Bill Moyers traces the trend to the policies of trickle-down Reaganomics that has now created two Americas, a buoyant Wall Street and a doleful Main Street.

Commerce Department figures released this past November showed that American companies had their best quarter in history, while unemployment languished at high levels and wages remained depressed.

Now corporations and independent tax-exempt organizations can collect unlimited amounts of money legally to influence elections and politicians. Today we live in a nation where extending billions of dollars of tax cuts to the wealthiest during a recession in the face of a massive deficit is a non-negotiable absolute priority for one political party.

Samuel might say, “I told you so.” We have chosen our own kings rather than the values of God. The kings we have chosen to rule over us are the kings of wealth and power. The kings we have chosen to rule over us are the kings of competition and individual autonomy.

Jesus said it is not to be so among us. “The greatest among you must become like the youngest, and the leader like one who serves.”

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

2 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Don Reed

Is the I Samuel 8 lesson an instance of regret at the loss of theocratic/priestly rule in favor of political/military rule (from the point of view of a later Priestly cast)?

It seems to be used here in our Lectionary as an interesting foreshadowing (albeit anachronistically) of the renewal of theocratic/priestly rule when the Son of David takes back over and is King forever. The good news of the Kingdom of God indeed!

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Blchitwood

Father Lowell you are so right and unfortunately the disciples of trickle-down Reaganomics in Congress are hard at work attempting to block policies that would better our economy for all, lest those policies make our President look good.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café