Support the Café

Search our Site

Republicans want to restrict Muslims more than Democrats do PRRI says

Republicans want to restrict Muslims more than Democrats do PRRI says

PRRI (Public Religion Research Institute) has just released a study showing that Republicans and Democrats differ markedly when it comes to restricting immigration from non-Christian countries as well as from Mexico and Central America.

Across the board,

Americans’ views are least restrictive with respect to immigration from predominantly Christian (14 percent), European (16 percent), African (24 percent), and Asian (29 percent) countries. In contrast, they are more opposed to immigration coming from the Middle East (45 percent), predominantly Muslim countries (49 percent), and Mexico and Central America (53 percent).

When contrasting Republicans and Democrats, however, the differences are more apparent:

While Republicans and Democrats have similarly restrictive views on immigration from predominantly Christian (15 percent vs. 12 percent, respectively) and European (20 percent vs. 13 percent) countries, they have markedly different views when it comes to other regions. Republicans are far more likely than Democrats to say there are too many immigrants from Africa (34 percent vs. 16 percent), Asia (37 percent vs. 24 percent), the Middle East (68 percent vs. 31 percent), Mexico and Central America (72 percent vs. 39 percent), and predominantly Muslim countries (73 percent vs. 32 percent), or that immigrants from these countries should not be permitted to come to the U.S. at all.



Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Prof Christopher Seitz

The democrats are far more reserved on this than I might have thought.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café