Support the Café
Search our site

Report on the events in Charlottesville released

Report on the events in Charlottesville released

Charlottesville, VA hired former US Attorney Tim Heaphy to conduct an independent review of the events of August 12, when violence broke out during a white supremacist rally. The 207 page document was recently released, and seems to present an unbiased examination of the situation. Heapy’s report points to a lack of communication and inter-agency cooperation. Police were also reported to have avoided stepping in as the various groups clashed, and even ignored reports of gunfire, according to Frank Buck, former mayor of Charlottesville. Law enforcement seemed simultaneously under prepared and over prepared. When the congregation of Beth Israel requested a police officer to be stationed at the synagogue, they were told that there would be an unarmed officer on a nearby street corner. The congregation ultimately hired a private security firm. On the other hand, state police wanted to put snipers on the roof of Christ Episcopal Church. The church had initially offered to let the police use the building as a staging ground, but when they heard about the sniper plan, permission was withdrawn.

The full report can be found here.

Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

newest oldest
Notify of
Cynthia Katsarelis
Member

I'm getting really tired of all the false equivalencies in our discourse. The right and left were not equally bad. The extreme right hates African Americans, Jewish people, LGBTQI people, and seem to feel entitled to intimidate unarmed counter-protesters with weapons. A small handful of people from the left seemed ready to engage in fights against Nazi's and Confederates, which was somehow honorable from 1861-65 and 1941-45, and took it upon themselves to protect the clergy and whatnot. These two things are not the same. I don't condone violence from the Anti-fascists, but it was far less than the right and for a far better cause. False equivalencies are killing us.

Like (0)
Dislike (1)
Fred+Loving
Guest
Fred+Loving

Took some reading but I did find the sharpshooter plan on page 74-75. Having spent the last forty years in public service in law enforcement and as a volunteer firefighter I find this disturbing. I visit this church from time to time when I do not have a priest available. Back in May I parked next to the Lee statue and attended the evening service. After I left a crowd gathered and spay painted obscene words on the statue.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Cynthia Katsarelis
Member

Christ Church was well within its moral obligations to refuse to allow snipers on their roof. It isn't clear to me why the police couldn't use the church for staging, but without snipers. There is a big difference between using sacred space to keep the peace vs. using it for potential killing.

Like (1)
Dislike (2)
Dana Lee
Guest
Dana Lee

The Left orchestrated the whole thing - Democrat officials allowed the Neo Nazis to march so it would look bad for our POTUS and the Republicans. Again, the Episcopalians are in the middle of controversy. Why didn't they let the police snipers be on the roof??? These are crazy times and we need to be vigilant. We need to become like Israel - armed and ready to defend ourselves within our country.

Like (3)
Dislike (2)
Scott Knitter
Guest
Scott Knitter

Sorry to see your desire for that sort of world, Dana. It's not one I'd want to live in.

Like (1)
Dislike (2)
Member

James, I do see your reference. I do wonder whether better planning over all would have offered time to work out with Christ Church (and with the Library) a clearer way to participate - and one more appropriate than offering "sniper positions." I would think the issues that rose from attempting to change the location made it harder for Christ Church to prepare, as they did generally.

Like (1)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2019_001B
2019_004

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café