Support the Café

Search our Site

Religious leaders speak out against Jindal tax plan

Religious leaders speak out against Jindal tax plan

Religious leaders, including the Rt. Rev’d. Morris K. Thompson, Jr., Bishop, Episcopal Diocese of Louisiana, the Rt Rev. Charles Jenkins (ret. of Louisiana), the Rt. Rev. Jacob W. Owensby, PhD, DD, Bishop, Episcopal Diocese of Western Louisiana, and many other Episcopal clergy, are speaking out on Governor Jindal’s tax plan according to a report in The Times-Picayune:

A group of Louisiana religious leaders representing more than 250 clergy from dozens of denominations statewide was scheduled to gather at the state capitol building in Baton Rouge this morning to voice their opposition to Gov. Bobby Jindal’s proposed tax plan.

The delegation hand-delivered a letter — called “An Open Letter from Louisiana Clergy to Governor Jindal” — to the governor’s office that expressed the concerns of the clergy that his tax overhaul proposal would put an unfair burden on low and moderate income families in Louisiana.

“We, the undersigned members of the Louisiana Clergy, are writing to express our deep concern about the tax proposal you are proposing for the upcoming legislative session,” the letter begins.

Full letter below:

March 18th, 2013

The Honorable Bobby Jindal, Governor P. O. Box 94004 Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9004

Dear Governor Jindal,

We, the undersigned members of the Louisiana Clergy, are writing to express our deep concern about the tax proposal you are proposing for the upcoming legislative session.

We serve in many different faith traditions, across a broad spectrum of people and communities in this State. As diverse as these traditions may be, we find unity around a few fundamental ethical principles: fairness, a concern for the least of these and an obligation to make our voices heard when matters of justice are at stake.

Our concerns about the proposed tax plan are as follows.

First, we are concerned that Louisiana already has one of the most regressive tax systems in the nation, putting a disproportionately high burden on low and moderate income families. Currently, families earning minimum wage (less than $16,000 per year) pay 10.6% of their income in state and local taxes; the average Louisiana family pays 10.1% of its income in taxes; while the wealthiest Louisiana families (earning over $1 million per year) pay only 4.6% of their income in state and local taxes. That is unacceptable, as a starting point.

Second, we are concerned that the reason we have such an unfair and regressive tax structure is our State’s heavy reliance on the sales tax. It is universally recognized that sales taxes create a disproportionate burden on poor and moderate-income families, who spend nearly all they earn. Louisiana already has the 3rd highest sales tax rate in the nation.

Third, we are concerned that your tax plan seeks to increase our state’s sales tax rates even further. Any increase in the sales tax would deepen the root causes behind the unfair and regressive nature of our state’s tax structure and worsen the burden for poor and moderate income families in our community.

Fourth, we are concerned that your plan proposes to use the increased revenue generated by a heavier burden on poor and moderate income families, not to fund any of the important needs and services our State faces, but to decrease the tax burden for those members of our community who are most blessed with wealth and resources. That, too, is unacceptable.

Fifth, we are concerned that your proposed tax plan will be unsustainable over the long term. Historically, sales have grown much more slowly than personal income, in our State and across the country. Swapping income taxes for sales taxes replaces a faster-growing revenue source with a slower-growing revenue source. We worry that your proposal would be “revenue neutral” in its first year, but “revenue negative” over the longer term. If our State begins to rely even more heavily upon a slower-growing portion of our economy for revenue, we will face deficits and service cuts down the road that make our current ones seem small.

We believe that any proposed law that would increase the tax burden on low- and moderate- income families in order to decrease it for wealthy families must be judged an unjust law.

We believe that any proposed law that would threaten the long-term fiscal soundness of our State must be judged an unwise law.

Therefore, we ask you, in the full spirit of humility and faith, to develop a fundamentally different framework for tax reform.

To that end, we submit the following basic principles as guidelines for the kind of tax reform that would be just and in accord with the ethical frameworks of our faith traditions:

Principle #1) Tax reform should not increase the sales tax rate or take any other steps that make our tax structure more regressive than it is already;

Principle #2) New sources of revenue should be used, not merely to redistribute the tax burden from one group to another, but to invest in high priorities for our state, such as healthcare, education, human services and infrastructure, which have seen significant and far-reaching cuts in recent years; and

Principle #3) Tax reform should not replace a faster-growing revenue source with a slower- growing revenue source, thereby threatening our State’s ability to afford important services and investments in the future.

We thank you for your serious consideration of these concerns. We would welcome the opportunity for a delegation of our leadership to meet with you to discuss these matters in more detail. We can be reached at to schedule that meeting.

We pray that you, and all of us, may be blessed with the judgment to move forward in a spirit of wisdom and fairness on such an important matter to the lives and well-being of so many.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Thanks, Bob. At least, we have the aesthetics.

Jindal did an exorcism when he was a young lad at Brown University, without even the help of a priest.

June Butler

Bob McCloskey

I have not heard that Jindal was ever an Episcopalian. As far as I know, he converted from Hinduism to Roman Catholicism.

June Butler


That four bishops of the Episcopal Church in Louisiana, two active and two retired, along with other Episcopal clergy signed the letter gives me great hope. I am proud to be a member of the Episcopal Church.

June Butler

Bob McCloskey

How sad that not a single Roman Catholic Bishop nor priest [perhaps one?] plus a nun/pastoral associate are signatories.

If I recall correctly the Governor publicly stated his converson from the Episcopal Church to the RC Church earlier in his lifetime, in which case we now know the rewards [if my memory is correct].

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café