Support the Café
Search our site

Reaching out to the “nones.”

Reaching out to the “nones.”

In his first ecumenical and interfaith gathering as Pope, Francis spoke to the fastest growing religious demographic: the “nones” and atheists. He said that atheists and the “spiritual but not religious” can be allies with the faithful for good.

(Francis) also reached out to those who don’t belong “to any religious tradition” but feel the “need to search for the truth, the goodness and the beauty of God.”

Francis echoed his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI, saying that the “attempt to eliminate God and the divine from the horizon of humanity” has often led to catastrophic violence.

But Francis, who has set a humbler tone to the papacy since his election on March 13, added that atheists and believers can be “precious allies” in their efforts “to defend the dignity of man, in the building of a peaceful coexistence between peoples and in the careful protection of creation.”

Which is different from another approach, where Rabbi David Wolpe says that being “spiritual but not religious” is by definition incomplete and selfish. This, judging from the comments, really touched a nerve.

Spirituality is an emotion. Religion is an obligation. Spirituality soothes. Religion mobilizes. Spirituality is satisfied with itself. Religion is dissatisfied with the world. Religions create aid organizations; as Nicholas Kristof pointed out in a column in the New York Times two years ago: the largest U.S.-based international relief and development organization is not Save the Children or Care, it’s World Vision, a Seattle-based Christian group.

Aid organizations involve institutions as well, and bureaucracies, and — yes — committee meetings. There is something profoundly, well, spiritual about a committee meeting. It involves individuals trying together to sort out priorities, to listen and learn from one another, to make a difference. I have found too often that when people say, “I stay away from the synagogue — too much politics,” what they mean is that they did not get their way. Institutions enable but they also frustrate, as do families and every other organized sector of human life. If you want frictionless, do it alone.

To be spiritual but not religious confines your devotional life to feeling good. If we have learned one thing about human nature, however, it is that people’s internal sense of goodness does not always match their behavior. To know whether your actions are good, a window is a more effective tool than a mirror. Ask others. Be part of a community. In short, join. Being religious does not mean you have to agree with all the positions and practices of your own group; I don’t even hold with everything done in my own synagogue, and I’m the Rabbi. But it does mean testing yourself in the arena of others.

This is a conversation we must have. How would you approach it?

Dislike (0)
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

8 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Harriet Baber

Now with a little photo-shopping--substitute Episcopal Church for Mammon--we could use that! We insiders know what the Episcopal Church is like already--we should be telling the world.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Jonathan Chesney

Harriet,

just saw an ad for a church that seems to parallel with your motto ("Take from it what you enjoy, believe what you please and behave as you will."):

http://godandmoney.com/uploads/Adbusters_1.jpg

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Gary Young

Pass the joint.

Gary Young

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
tgflux

As a religious person, my first approach (perhaps ironically) is Hippocratic: "First, Do No Harm."

Because I'm in on some of those committee meetings, my first priority is to see that my religious group does no harm to those outside of it---most especially, the Nones.

Andrew, while I get why you would say that "this is a conversation we must have", I think it's more about modelling good, Christ-like action. Preaching the Gospel, "using words only when necessary."

I'm all for evangelism: the personal invite to "Come Join Us". But those are less-than-empty (actually *insulting*) words, if one's religious group is doing harm. Priorities!

JC Fisher

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Clint Davis

You know what, I love being lectured, called names, and labelled, because then at least I know what people think of me, what I am, and what I'm doing, and think of those to whom I most obviously belong. Only when that is out in the open can I either challenge assumptions, upend stereotypes, or have a real and completely frank discussion. Only then, when it's all on the table, can anyone ever really move forward. But likewise, if I'm going to be lectured and labelled, then the lecturer better get ready for a rebuttal as learned and thoughtful as they think their lecture is, except I know I will work as hard as I can to keep mine free from all malice. Don't ever respond to a lecture by fleeing, respond by a lecture right back, and lay it all out for an honest discussion, debate and evaluation, without any malice whatsoever.

Am I crazy? Am I a minority? Is there something wrong with my thinking on this? Be as innocent as doves and wise as serpents, that's what Jesus said. I believe him!

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts
2020_001

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café