Support the Café

Search our Site

Re-structuring the church

Re-structuring the church

The Diocese of Oregon meeting in Convention this past weekend adopted the following resolution supporting the work of the Standing Commission on Structure:

Calling for Reorganization of The Episcopal Church

Resolved, that the Diocese of Oregon, meeting in November 2011 in its 123rd Convention, calls upon the Standing Commission on the Structure of the Church (SCSC), to continue its work, through prayer, study and Church-wide conversation, to develop recommendations and supporting resolutions for reorganizing The Episcopal Church to enhance its mission and ministry in the 21st century. This work should include, but not be limited to, a review of staffing organization at the national and provincial levels, program focus and delivery, and revenue sharing. And be it further

Resolved, that the SCSC report its findings and recommendations to the 78th General Convention (2015) of The Episcopal Church for further action.

Action of Convention: ADOPTED

What other discussions of re-structuring the church have been held? Have other dioceses commented or adopted resolutions? Where is the Sauls’ proposal? Has his proposal been entered into the process of General Convention? Has anyone seen the details of his proposal? Have discussions been held with the Standing Commission on Structure? Has the Executive Council seen it? What other questions need to be asked?


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John D. Andrews

Any proposal that diminishes the voice and authority of the laity should be a non-starter. I recall Bishop Smith of Arizona posting an article showing how churches that embrace collaborative leadership are doing well. To diminish the role of laity, thus continuing with a top-down model of leadership will not serve the Episcopal Church well, but would most likely lead to further decline in membership and and our spiritual presence in the world.

Bill Carroll


Our goal is to put it back with the Deputies and Bishops, which is where this will be hammered out anyway, and to commend the 2015 timeline without necessarily endorsing any other aspect of Bishop Sauls’ proposal.

Jim Naughton

I appreciate what your diocese was trying to do with this, Bill. I don’t have a firm opinion about a special convention. And I don’t actually think the House of Bishops as a whole, but rather certain of its members, are trying to roll the House of Deputies. But I agree that we need a serious conversation about governance sooner rather than later. I just don’t want it to take place in the framework Bishop Sauls has created.

Bill Carroll

The following resolution was passed in Southern Ohio by (what I perceived to be) a unanimous voice vote. It was moved as a substitute to the Sauls boilerplate language on behalf of our entire deputation.

In my view, the issues are too urgent to sit on past 2015 and should not be derailed by concerns about how Bishop Sauls offered the proposal, but that the precise process should be up to all of us and the leadership of the Deputies and Bishops need to get on the same page. We specifically commend collaboration with any interim bodies that have been working on these matters but want to insist that the Deputies and Bishops work together to achieve fundamental change by 2015. This precisely is what the resolution calls on us to do. My own sense is that this will require a Special General Convention, though we left this out of the resolution because not all members of our deputation could support it in good conscience.

RESOLVED, that the 137th Convention of the Diocese of Southern Ohio urges the 77th General Convention of the Episcopal Church to act boldly to achieve fundamental structural changes by 2015 for the sake of our Lord Jesus Christ and the mission that he has entrusted to us as baptized members of his Body. As the Church undertakes this restructuring for the sake of our mission, it is essential that we keep always before us the good news to those who seek, the good news to the poor, the Baptismal Covenant, and the Marks of Mission; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the 137th Convention of the Diocese of Southern Ohio urges that the House of Deputies and House of Bishops, collaborating with the interim bodies that have been working on restructuring, should jointly adopt an agreed upon process for deciding upon these matters in a transparent, fair, and expeditious way that preserves the stake of all baptized persons in the governance of the Episcopal Church; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the secretary of convention be directed to send a copy of this resolution to the President of the House of Deputies, the Presiding Bishop, and all bishops and standing committees of the Episcopal Church, requesting that it be shared with members of the deputation of each diocese.

Ben Shambaugh

I find the size and slowness of general convention to be such bad stewardship of our human and financial resources. With one lay person and one clergy from each diocese, we could meet in a church building or at a conference center and actually talk to each other and make decisions as a community… and save lots of money that could be used for mission. In the same way, most resolutions at GC are forgotten or never even known by anyone except deputies after they are passed. Is there some way to limit resolutions to a few key items, letting the PB or HOB speak for us at other times? We need to define adiaphora and subsidiary and live by them!

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café