Support the Café

Search our Site

Protecting a predator is not a religious right

Protecting a predator is not a religious right

An Arkansas judge ruled that a judicatory cannot claim a First Amendment privilege to fend off accountability for one of its’ clergy in a sexual abuse lawsuit.


A judge ruled that a Fayetteville woman’s lawsuit can proceed against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Little Rock, in which she claims the diocese knew or should have known about a sexual relationship she was lured into by a priest.

Pulaski County Circuit Court Judge Wendell Griffen ruled there was no merit to claims by the diocese and Bishop Anthony Taylor that Shannon Oates’ lawsuit violates the religious protections guaranteed by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported in Saturday’s editions that Griffen determined the church couldn’t prove those protections should block the litigation.

Oates, 41, sued in April, claiming that Charles Kanu manipulated her into a sexual and romantic relationship while acting as her spiritual mentor as she converted to Catholicism between spring 2009 and October 2010 in Mountain Home. The relationship continued after Kanu was transferred to parishes in Marianna and North Little Rock….

…Church officials knew or should have known what Kanu was doing, according to the lawsuit, which alleges Kanu had acted similarly with other women. Church officials were negligent in supervising Kanu and failed to protect Oates from him, the lawsuit claims.

The church has denied any wrongdoing, arguing in its response to the lawsuit that any injuries Oates suffered, she brought, at least partially, on herself and that she should be suing Kanu as well. Taylor acknowledged he had Kanu investigated for another matter, and Kanu was dismissed….

…Church officials cited First Amendment protections in its call for Griffen to dismiss the lawsuit at a Feb. 24 hearing.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Leslie Scoopmire

Wow. Did they really just make the same argument Warren Jeffs made? Did they REALLY? And did they not know how that turned out?

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café