Support the Café

Search our Site

Muslim Emoji, proposed by a German teenager

Muslim Emoji, proposed by a German teenager

The emoji populating virtual reality reflect a increasing range of demographic, fashion, professional and ethnic identities, but one community is missing, and a German teenager is proposing that it be added: emojis for Muslim women and men. From a story in the New York Times:

Ms. [Rayouf] Alhumedhi, who was born in Saudi Arabia and now lives and attends high school in Berlin, began wearing a head scarf at 13. Although she has never been harassed for covering her hair, she has seen people give her some hard stares. All the more reason, she figured, to try to have it included on her keyboard.

“We need to be represented with the amount of diversity, the amount of difference in this world,” she said.

In an online discussion on Reddit on Tuesday, she answered questions about what the hijab meant to her and responded to critics who argued that it represented the oppression of women.

“I would like to be represented and acknowledged,” she wrote. “It might seem baffling, but when I wear the head scarf I actually feel liberated because I’m in control of what I want to cover. The head scarf allows for people to see past a woman’s beauty and see her for her knowledge.”

While Alhumedhi’s experience in Germany has been relatively peaceful, other Muslim immigrants report they have been spat on or insulted.

Alhumedhi first approached Apple and received no response; next she reached out to the Unicode Consortium. Her supporters include a founder of Reddit, and she’ll be in California soon to present her proposal. If accepted, her emoji would go into effect in fall 2017.

This past Tuesday, Alhumedhi initiated a conversation on Reddit about the emoji, though most of the discussion gravitated toward questions and commentary on perceptions of the hijab and the oppression of women. Alhumedhi:

[Alhumedhi]: …a hijab isn’t meant to “protect” women. And not wearing one isn’t assumed to be “tempting” men by default. Those are seriously some very odd assumptions. A hijab (the scarf, along with loose full-body covering) is meant to identify the woman as a chaste Muslim woman and is supposed to give off the signal that this woman isn’t welcoming to any kind of flirting. That is the actual reason it was mandated back in the 7th century. Muslim men are mandated to “lower their gaze” (typical English translation of the Arabic phrase) whether or not a woman is covered properly. No “hiding their sexuality” for women. There isn’t even any implication about anything covered being sexual…

[Q:] But aren’t non-Muslim people able to cover what they want as well? Unless it is for religious purposes, why not wear something else?

I’m not trying to be disrespectful, this is a genuine question. 🙂

[Alhumedhi]: Sure, you can easily wear the headscarf or cover up modestly, without having any religious ties, to achieve the same result. But, keep in mind, while the headscarf plays a role in seeing beyond one’s beauty, it also has religious and traditional meanings behind it. For example, I wear it so my thoughts and ideas are empasized, but I also wear it because many of my friends wear it and we share something in common. I also wear it because inevitably people approach me differently and respect my want for space. To many Muslim women, it also has cultural ties.

A non-Muslim can surely wear it to aim for people looking beyond her appearance, and we would share that aim. However,they would lack cultural and traditional ties.



Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Woodrum

Nothing personal. A general observation. Sorry, David, if you felt offended. I know it’s terribly old-fashioned, but I believe human dignity is found in the doctrine of the imago Dei, not the imago moji or moticon.

Paul Woodrum

Thanks for the clarification, David. Not so much for the unwarranted judgment.

David Allen


There’s something somewhat pathetic in needing an emoji that looks like ones self in order to find or affirm one’s dignity.

Paul Woodrum

Thanks, Ann. But to get back to my original point, original emoji allowed anyone, norm or not norm, to express common, human emotions. Now it seems they are being turned into political, ethnic, cultural, and racial statements. That, I would suggest, defeats their purpose of providing one of the few, and much needed, expressions of what we share in common — smiles to frowns — rather than reinforcing what divides us into our own little clans.

David Carver

That’s very well put- I’ve heard it said that “a smile is universal”. I think you have a good point here.

David Allen

That is a overly simple concept of emoticons and emoji. Emoticons were developed in Western culture (US & Europe) while emoji grew out of the pictographs which make up some writen Eastern Asian languages. And like everything have evolved over the years of their existence. You insisting that they not evolve is someone just being stuck in the old days. The world left you behind.

Paul Woodrum

That too. Now, where is my old, white, male, gay, cranky emoji?

Ann Fontaine

Working on it!

Paul Woodrum

Good to know “gay” is the new normal.

David Allen

I’m sure that she meant old, white, male.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café