Support the Café

Search our Site

Priest promotes progress on women bishops in Church of England

Priest promotes progress on women bishops in Church of England

The Rev. Janet Appleby has drafted an amendment that has received overwhelming support in the House of Bishops regarding the issue of women bishops in the Church of England.

The BBC reports that “Senior Anglican bishops have significantly watered down proposed concessions to those in the Church of England who are against women bishops. It is hoped the proposals – to consider the views of individuals and lobby groups – will allow for agreement ahead of a planned vote in November. Meanwhile, a BBC poll suggests nearly 80% of people support women bishops. But one in five would have a less favourable view of the Church if women were not allowed to become bishops.”

From Church Times:

The House of Bishops, meeting this week to rescue the women-bishops legislation, has adopted an amendment suggested by a woman priest.

The House met on Wednesday to find a way out of the impasse over the legislation. In July, the General Synod declined to vote on the final wording, after the House had inserted clause 5(1)(c), which stated that the Code of Practice should cover “the selection of male bishops or male priests the exercise of ministry by whom is consistent with the theological convictions as to the consecration of women” of the PCC in a traditionalist parish.

Opponents of women bishops quietly welcomed the clause, but many supporters found it unacceptable, and threatened to vote against the legislation if it remained. As a result, the final vote was postponed until an extraordinary meeting of the General Synod in November, giving the Bishops time to reconsider.

In a consultation exercise during the summer, there appeared to have been no shift in the entrenched positions. Almost all the preferences recorded favoured either the retention of 5(1)(c), or its removal. None of the rewordings suggested by the steering committee attracted any great interest.

But on Wednesday evening, the Archbishop of Canterbury announced that the House of Bishops had voted to accept a new version of the amendment submitted by the Revd Janet Appleby, Team Vicar in the Willington Team and Vicar and Minister in the Church of the Good Shepherd Local Ecumenical Project in Wallsend, Tyne & Wear.

It reads that the Code should cover “the selection of male bishops and male priests in a manner which respects the grounds on which Parochial Church Councils issue Letters of Request under section 3”.

Letters of Request are the means whereby a traditionalist parish asks for a new priest or for episcopal oversight by someone other than the diocesan bishop.

Dr Williams said: “It is particularly significant and welcome that the new text emerged not from the House of Bishops itself but rather from a serving woman priest.”

The statement reported that Mrs Appleby’s amendment had received “overwhelming support from the House of Bishops in both their discussions and in the final vote.

Read full story here. The full text of the draft legislation is available here.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Apps 55753818692 1675970731 F785b701a6d1b8c33f0408

I hardly ever use the terms “female priest” and “woman priest”. When it comes up in conversation I simply say, “…my priest, her name is Georgia, said the other day…” or something along those lines. When talking to Roman Catholics, such a sentence can really take them by surprise.

Cullin R. Schooley


Hmmm…once again, it takes a woman to clean up the mess made by The Boys.

Will all future women bishops be recognized with the title “Mummy”?


Kevin McGrane

Adam Wood


Yeah. The Roman Catholic Women Priests are not helpful. At all.


Is there any reason why the ABC and CoE insisted on the Indaba process with TEC and the rest of the AC over homosexuality, but not insisting it regarding themselves over the full inclusion of women in their church?

It was good enough for us, and seems to be working well. Why not for themselves? Are they afraid of the outcome?

Kevin McGrane

Cynthia Katsarelis

I’m with Adam (except that I do need a “woman doctor”). I love England and have had wonderful experiences worshipping there. But the upper echelons are bona fide, knuckle dragging, neanderthals on women and LGBT, and their use of language reveals how obtuse they are. So much better to have a church where many more voices are heard.

The fact that a woman suggested the compromise doesn’t give it more power in my view. The only thing I can think of is perhaps adding a grandfather clause, limiting the opt out until 2020 or something like that. Give the misogynist set more time, but a limited time, to see that the world won’t end.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café