2020_010_A
Support the Café
Search our site

Preaching to their own choirs

Preaching to their own choirs

Rob Bell’s recent book “Love Wins” stirred up controversy mainly in Evangelical circles in the US, when he questioned the existence of hell. Other books have popped up in response. According to Ken Chitwood, blogging at Sacred Duty on Chron.com, no matter which side the writers are on, they are pretty much preaching to their own choir.

For this reason, Bell’s book resonates more with the general public and less with the Evangelical faithful. Likewise, Chan’s book, and its compatriots, will do little to change public conclusions about God’s judgment and hell.When all is said and done, the majority of Americans will continue to question the doctrine of hell and instead believe in a God that is loving and nonjudgmental. Meanwhile, Evangelicals will, for the most part, persist to publicly frame heaven and hell in black-and-white terms even if they find the doctrine personally uncomfortable (as Chan openly confesses).

Chan’s book, and others like it, sought to comfort (and consolidate) their Evangelical base and settle the boat after Bell rocked it. To that end I believe they succeeded. However, in private conversations and wading through various blogs and forums I’ve noticed that no one is really changing their mind about the doctrine of hell. The Christians I know that believed in hell before Love Wins still believe in hell. They read Bell’s book and wanted to know how to counter it – Chan’s book, and the others, gave them the answer they were looking for. Still, Chan and the others hoped their books would persuade the doubtful about the reality of hell. Although Chan’s book is balanced, well written and matches Bell’s in pastoral intensity, featuring honest wrestling with the idea of hell and damnation for unbelievers and sinners, I believe it will do little to turn the wider culture on to the idea of hell or even sway the marginal milieu that question damnation after death.

Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café