Support the Café

Search our Site

Parish reactions to bishop’s letter on same-sex unions vary

Parish reactions to bishop’s letter on same-sex unions vary

Not all South Carolina congregations share the opinions of their bishop.

While some of the congregations in the SC Lowcountry area publicly agree with Bishop Lawrence, Erin Moody of the Beaufort/Port Royal Reporter writes of at least one differing understanding:

The bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina circulated the letter to his Lowcountry congregations Sunday, condemning the actions of the national Episcopal church on same-sex blessing and gender issues and said he would open talks this week about the future of the diocese in the U.S. church….

All Saints Episcopal Church on Hilton Head Island, staked a more moderate stance, but the Rev. Richard Lindsey, the church’s rector, said the congregation will comply with Lawrence’s views.

“I stand solidly behind the (national) Episcopal Church,” he said. “That’s not to say I’m not loyal to my bishop, but I tend to disagree. … We will honor where he stands because we are part of his diocese and he is our bishop.”

The church’s website states it is a “welcoming, inclusive” church, and Lindsey said he was not surprised with the General Convention’s decision because it is the direction the national church has been headed for more than a decade.

“This is the tip of the iceberg,” he said. “The real issue is about how we read scripture, about how we interpret God’s Word today. God has given us indications we need to have a broader understanding of creation and a broader understanding of how humans are formed.”


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
BrotherTom Hudson

So, +SC has finally revealed what he intended to do all along. Despite his assurances that he would not take his diocese out of TEC, he has now (with the encouragement of Nazir-Ali, surely) begun the “consultations” that he will use to justify his departure. Another round of acrimonious litigation, complicated by the state Supreme Court’s earlier decision. Why did we ever trust him?


Why do I get the feeling that +Lawrence’s “talks” about the future of his diocese in TEC don’t involve actual discussion and listening, particularly with the national hierarchy?

Eric Bonetti

Carole, given a character like the one Lawrence has demonstrated, Lindsey’s remarks are almost full-on rebellion-on-the-barricades-waving-a-banner.

He disagrees with his bishop and believes we need a broader understanding of Scripture, and said so in public. Outright refusal to comply with Lawrence would just mean another good man done gone from the pulpit.

– Mark Brunson

Carole May

Sounds to me like these parishes should take Jay Johnson’s course at CDSP on Same Sex Blessings. They have much to learn.

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café