Support the Café
Search our site

Original design for the National Cathedral

Original design for the National Cathedral

The iconic National Cathedral in Washington DC is such a striking structure when you see it on the skyline that it’s hard to imagine that anyone could have conceived of a different form for the building that was financed by the Episcopal Church. But in an article on the Smithsonian website on DC monuments that were designed but never built, you can see that original plan was very different than what we have now.

““Many people assume it was a foregone conclusion that it was Gothic,” says Moeller. But the original design for the National Cathedral was in a Renaissance style. Architect Ernest Flagg, of New York, supplied the Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation with drawings. The cathedral had a 208-foot-tall rotunda, a dome with cutouts of simple Greek crosses and, notes Moeller, a particularly interesting entryway. “It is a real niche, pulling people in,” he says. “There was a certain sculptural sense to that. I can imagine that being a very memorable experience.””

Follow the link to see the picture here.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Facebooktwitterpinterestlinkedinmail

Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ronald Caldwell

Gasp! The original design was a monstrosity! Wrong on so many levels. First, the dome would compete with the magnificent Capitol dome and lose on every point. Washington DC is often called the new Rome.This edifice would have made it too obvious, and not in a good way. An English Gothic design, while not original or very American, reminds us of our English roots which I think are more important to us than the Roman ones. Does not everyone agree that the lovely, elegant, lofty, restrained Gothic national cathedral has become a much beloved national treasure largely by its own architectural genius.

C. Wingate

One should keep in mind that (a) Satterlee really wanted a Gothic building; (b) as you can puzzle out from this picture, they hadn’t acquired any land yet; and (c) the third and fourth alternatives would have been St. Martin’s in the Fields blown up huge or a Romanesque pile.

Paul Woodrum

19th century eclecticism at its height and worst. Shades of St.Paul’s, St. Peter’s, St. Suplice and the Capital, all over wrought. Glad we didn’t go in that direction though not sure faux, cookie-cutter Gothic, even with some contemporary ornament,is a great improvement though, on the skyline at least, it contrasts with the Capital.

tgflux

The niche entrance is interesting, but overall, it looks like a St Peter’s wannabe! (and in my eyes—speaking strictly architecturally here—that’s NOT a good thing to want to be)

JC Fisher

David Allen

Personally, I am glad that thing was not what was built. To me that style is not the timeless design that some think it is.

Bro. David

Facebooktwitterrss
Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café