Support the Café

Search our Site

Order barring protesters outside Denver cathedral stands

Order barring protesters outside Denver cathedral stands

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear a case barring protesters from disrupting services at St. John’s Cathedral in Denver.

A few years ago, a group of anti-abortion protesters took to picketing outside the cathedral, showing graphic images of aborted fetuses. This was especially disturbing on Palm Sunday and at other times when parishioners, including small children, were outdoors. From the Denver Post:

The order stems from a 2005 protest during which Kenneth Scott and others protested near an outdoor Palm Sunday service at Denver’s Saint John’s Cathedral. Protesters, who disagreed with the Episcopal church’s stance in favor of abortion rights, shouted at the group while displaying large images of aborted fetuses. About 200 children attended the service, and several became upset during the protest.

The church sued Scott, and an order was issued that banned him from displaying “gruesome images of mutilated fetuses or dead bodies in a manner reasonably likely to be viewed by children under 12.” The order bans Scott and other protesters from displaying the images only near the Denver church.

The Very Rev. Peter Eaton, dean of St. John’s, wrote in a letter to parishioners this week:

For many years, a small fundamentalist Christian group led by Ken Scott conducted demonstrations outside the Cathedral. They demonstrated on many occasions over the years, but had come to focus on Palm Sunday and Easter Day, when we conduct religious services and activities outdoors. Their demonstrations significantly disrupted our worship, and clearly upset our parishioners, especially our children.

Over time we had tried a number of ways to discourage this interference, but without effect. In 2005, a new parishioner and attorney, David Ball, along with the then Sub-Dean, Stephen Carlsen, were so disturbed by the demonstration that they resolved to try to obtain a restraining order. Our petition for a temporary restraining order was heard four days later, on Good Friday, and was granted. Subsequently, that restraining order became permanent. Since that time, Mr. Scott has been appealing the judgment through the legal system. The judgment in favor of the Cathedral has been upheld through a series of appeals, and now cannot be challenged further. Mr. Scott and his group may still demonstrate, but they must stand in a specific area across the street and down the block in a place where the interference with our religious worship and activities will be minimal.

We are of course delighted with the final outcome of this case. Both Mr. Scott’s freedom of speech and our freedom of worship have been upheld, and we now have a “buffer zone” between us and the demonstrators.


Café Comments?

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eric Bonetti

@John: Are you thinking of George Tiller? If so, he was killed in a Lutheran church.

That said, we have seen violence in a variety of churches, including the recent killing of an Episcopal priest in Maryland. My ardent hope is that all churches will review their security and take steps to increase safety, particularly in environments in which children could be at risk, such as nurseries and church schools.

Eric Bonetti

John Bennett

A key difference is that ACT-UP has never killed anyone.

Let’s not forget that a person motivated by the sentiments of anti-reproductive freedom protesters entered a Wichita Episcopal church a few years back and shot and killed a doctor during the Eucharist.


This sounds like a good decision: to try to protect free speech, yet recognize when free speech crosses over into obliterating others’ free expression (the freedom of St John’s worshippers).

I’m just sorry it was only obtainable via a lawsuit.

JC Fisher

I suppose someone (not necessarily here) might cite the infamous ACT-UP worship-disruption @ St Patrick’s (RC) NYC (c. 1989?). How is that any different? It isn’t…but I think that action gained its impact BECAUSE they did it (IIRC) only once (whereas this anti-choice group just doesn’t know when to quit).

Apps 55753818692 1675970731 F785b701a6d1b8c33f0408

I’m surprised one doesn’t hear of this type of thing, involving an Episcopal Church, more often.

-Cullin R. Schooley

Support the Café
Past Posts

The Episcopal Café seeks to be an independent voice, reporting and reflecting on the Episcopal Church and the Anglican tradition.  The Café is not a platform of advocacy, but it does aim to tell the story of the church from the perspective of Progressive Christianity.  Our collective sympathy, as the Café, lies with the project of widening the circle of inclusion within the church and empowering all the baptized for the role to which they have been called as followers of Christ.

The opinions expressed at the Café are those of individual contributors, and, unless otherwise noted, should not be interpreted as official statements of a parish, diocese or other organization. The art and articles that appear here remain the property of their creators.

All Content  © 2017 Episcopal Café