Opinion: War – what is it good for?

by

From time to time, the Café publishes Letters to the Editor from our readers.  Before submitting an editorial, please check out our Submissions page for guidelines.

 

by Susan Letendre

 

I just called a small office where I knew the people well, or so I thought. I asked Sarah, the administrative assistant, how her holidays had been, and she answered, “They were a bit sad. My husband is deployed.” I didn’t catch the word “deployed” and thought she was saying his name, “Dick Boyd?” and that I should know the story by hearing the name. I said, “I’m sorry, Sarah, I didn’t catch that.” She repeated, “My husband is deployed, in Afghanistan.” In a flash, I realized that this was the only person I knew who was off fighting a war, and I only knew him secondhand. After a moment, I asked for his first name, it’s Rob, and said I would keep him in my prayers. She was inordinately grateful, and I wished I could say something else. Perhaps, “Thank you for your and Rob’s service,” or “I’m grateful to you and Rob for keeping us free.”

 

I wished fervently that I could believe he is off fighting for freedom, for justice, to create peace. But I do believe, as Bob Dylan phrased it, that he is “a pawn in their game.” As most of us do, I watch the powers that be right now, the oligarchy, and how they twist reality to suit their gain.

 

This is nothing new. War has always been glamorized as a means of selling it to the populace, and to those who join up. It is no accident that such high percentages of the fighting men and women are minority, ranging from nearly 0% in the top ranks of officers to well over 43% in the bottom two ranks of the enlisted.

 

They are also overwhelmingly from lower economic groups, and the military keeps them that way. Just look at college graduation figures of those going into the military: over 82% for officers, under 6% for enlisted. These men and women are sent into mortal danger to guarantee our supply of oil, to make profits for the huge and growing monster that is our security industry, and to insure that legislators get re-elected. Even if they are not killed or maimed, they live in fear because of a lie, leave their loved ones in fear for them and themselves because of a lie, come home damaged emotionally from having been taught to kill their fellow humans, and from living in mortal terror, because of a lie, and then have to live this lie so as to justify what they have seen and done and been.

 

In the meantime, I talk and write against war and militarization. I work for peace and understanding. Yet, I live a lie, as well, because I live isolated from it, as if the world were a loving and safe place. While right around the corner, just down the street, in the next small office, is Sarah, missing Rob.

____________________________________________________________________________

Susan Letendre is a writer and educator, a peace and social justice activist, and a storyteller who recounts only true stories. She lives in Rhode Island.

 

image: On May 27, 2007—Memorial Day—Mary McHugh mourns her dead fiancé, Sgt. James Regan, in Arlington National Cemetery’s Section 60. Regan had been killed by an IED explosion in February in Iraq. PHOTOGRAPH BY JOHN MOORE, GETTY

 

Dislike (6)
Facebooktwittergoogle_pluspinterestlinkedinmail

Our comment policy requires that you use your real first and last names and provide an email address (your email will not be published). Comments that use non-PG rated language, include personal attacks, that are not provable as fact or that we deem in any way to to be counter to our mission of fostering respectful dialogue will not be posted. We also ask that you limit your comments to no more than four comments per story per day. Comments are limited to 1000 characters or approximately 150 words.

9 Comments on "Opinion: War – what is it good for?"

avatar
1000
  Subscribe  
Notify of
The Rev. W. David Dobbins
Guest
The Rev. W. David Dobbins

I agree that the true purposes and costs of our war industry are often hidden. Dad said little about being in Sudbury England as a young B-17 pilot during WWII. Fifty years later we went to Sudbury and stood where his plane had been tied down. We spoke to a local who had been fascinated by the Americans and chronicled their experiences. I learned there that Dad had behaved heroically--diving into a burning plane to kill the engines before it exploded--and had suffered the trauma of a mid-air collision during a training mission where the other plane and its crew had been lost. And Dad's deepest sorrow: he dropped "dirty bombs" (napalm) in 1945 on French villages where he knew innocent men, women and children lived. This hidden history had effectively changed my Dad forever-- the eager young pilot became the man I knew: courageous in his devotion to our family, but tortured by a costly burden of trauma and unresolved grief that he carried to his grave.

Like (1)
Dislike (0)
Ann Fontaine
Editor

Susan: Thanks for risking stating your thoughts and feelings here. You raise many good points about race, education, class, etc. and the military. When I worked at the VA nursing home with all the vets of many wars - I ended up feeling the uselessness of war and was glad when I have worked against it though I appreciated those who had served (this was after the VietNam war) There are many reasons people join the military, of course. Many told me that it offered a future where they saw none. I wish we could offer that as a country instead of sending people off to be damaged forever. My opinion on war was shaped early on by the film "The Americanization of Emily." But nothing I have seen has really changed that for me.

Like (0)
Dislike (0)
Jon White
Admin

I agree that our imperative is to work for peace and understanding and against war and militarization. The fetishization of our military is dangerous for our nation and it is something our founders were concerned about and sought to counter.

However, as a veteran, the tone of your piece suggests that all who serve are gullible idiots. You seem to not allow for the real and complex reasons people enter the military. It also infantilizes us and does not recognize that we possess our own agency.

That you don’t personally know anyone who is serving in the military is of concern. You have “othered” us and filled in your own lack of knowledge from your imagination. You are not alone in this, unfortunately. The gap between the military and the population it serves is wide and growing wider and is unhealthy.

I don’t think, ultimately, that your advocacy, ostensibly on my behalf and for others like me, will be effective so long as we exist primarily in your imagination.

Like (3)
Dislike (0)
Kenneth Knapp
Guest
Kenneth Knapp

Since you are working for “peace and understanding,” you might start by understanding that most members of the military would find your uncharitable and unflattering portrayal of them to be arrogant, condescending, and offensive. Not to mention patently false.

Like (4)
Dislike (1)
Member

Thank-you for sharing this.

Like (1)
Dislike (1)
Member

Perhaps now is a good time to express something that's been on my mind for awhile. It's a question that needs to be asked regarding this site. I'm curious as to what anyone thought might be gained by including like/dislike buttons on posts. Other than creating a hostile, finger-pointing atmosphere that discourages dialogue, what is gained?

This heartfelt post has garnered three dislikes and one like as of now. My simple sentiment thanking the contributor for sharing this has one "dislike". You really have to wonder what anonymous troll comes from the shadows to express dislike solely for an expression of gratitude to a contributor. But that largely irrelevant point aside, can anyone explain to me how these like/dislike buttons are appropriate for what is billed as a progressive, Christian venue, or how they encourage dialogue?

Like (1)
Dislike (1)
Jon White
Admin

I asked it to be added because people would regularly say something like "if I could like this comment I would." Additionally, I thought it would provide an opportunity for people too weigh in without having to make a comment themselves if somebody already said what they were thinking. In truth it is used sparingly, 3/4 of comments receive no votes at all.

Like (1)
Dislike (0)
Susan Letendre
Guest
Susan Letendre

Dear Helen: Thank you for your comments. I agree with you. Perhaps those who disliked what I wrote, which was indeed straight from my heart, feel the need to take a moment to think about what it is they didn't like before commenting. I know I always do. However, the violence in which this country is engaged and engulfed is so overwhelming, powerful, and destructive that, I believe, people of conscience need to get in there and grapple with it. My hope is that, however we may disagree, we can join in a respectful, loving discourse.

Like (1)
Dislike (0)